Tommy Robinson

orpingtoneagle said:
Ok I was in part just being provocative.....

Bout is that the reason why he lives abroad?.I never said he was a victim I said he was a grifter. He has never said that and I cannot see that moving abroad would make him any safer. Maybe it is for tax or legal reasons we just do not know but the fact is like so many of our great 'patriots,' he has chosen to live outside the UK and have a swipe at the country from abroad.

Bit like that Charlie Mullins fella who seems to delight in his comments on the state of a nation he loves so much he moves away.

It's really easy in life to say what you don't agree with than fight for what you do.
Click to expand...
aka risible drivel
 
Badger11 said:
Bloody right. The police had no justifiable cause for pulling him over and arresting him other than a copper trying to get a celebrity notch on his truncheon.
Click to expand...
Harassment, plain and simple.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
your antipathy toward him is only matched by your ignorance of even what he says. TR is happy to fill the country with Polish Plumbers, Caribbean Bus Drivers and Chinese entrepreneurs. And certainly he has support among the Jews of North London. His collection of buddies is pluralistic and kaleidoscope-multicultural....all under the British flag. All giving some respect to the nation on Remembrance Sunday.

While i would admit that his following is largely white British....there are also many other ethnicities that follow him. He would have been relatively ok for the country turning into a New York, but not a New Riyadh/Tehran.

www.hrw.org

Saudi Arabia: Executions Surge in 2025

Saudi authorities have been carrying out an unprecedented surge in executions in 2025 without apparent due process.
www.hrw.org www.hrw.org
Click to expand...
Fine. Some aspects of immigration.
I have never been anything but supportive of his actions over the grooming gangs but am not as much of a fanboy apart from that.
 
Teddy Eagle said:
Fine. Some aspects of immigration.
I have never been anything but supportive of his actions over the grooming gangs but am not as much of a fanboy apart from that.
Click to expand...
Robinson is symptomatic of the rapid decline of this country and the failure of our so called political elite.

The so called far right are associated with all kinds of historical negativity, but the problem is that many claims made by people of that persuasion have been proven right.

Enoch Powell said it all many decades ago. He was a credible politician. Tommy Robinson has dragged himself up and into the limelight from a questionable past, thanks to the ineptitude and ideological idiocy of the establishment.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
Enoch Powell said it all many decades ago. He was a credible politician. Tommy Robinson has dragged himself up and into the limelight from a questionable past, thanks to the ineptitude and ideological idiocy of the establishment.
Click to expand...

Correct. And you can also be certain that if TR fell under a bus tomorrow, just like buses, there would be another one arriving in. In double quick-time. TR is the symptom. The Grooming Gang scandal was the cause.
Like Gerry Adams or Yassir Arafat.....you may not like the ideologues but they represent an angry cohort of people.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
'Stephen Yaxley Lennon'.

The BBC have no credibility left.

The sad part is that a bloke like Tommy Robinson looks more credible than our government and the premier broadcaster.
Click to expand...
You attack the BBC for a full report on a court case which produced a result you approve of?

He would have been charged in his real name so it’s obvious that was how it must be reported.

It’s also obvious he was stopped because of who he is. The police would be failing in their duty should they not be alert when previous offenders passed them. That the Judge was unwilling to convict him of a terrorism offence was hardly surprising given both the high bar that needed to be cleared and the expensive barrister provided by his backer.

Does that make him credible? It’s incredible that you think it might!
 
orpingtoneagle said:
Ok I was in part just being provocative.....

Bout is that the reason why he lives abroad?.I never said he was a victim I said he was a grifter. He has never said that and I cannot see that moving abroad would make him any safer. Maybe it is for tax or legal reasons we just do not know but the fact is like so many of our great 'patriots,' he has chosen to live outside the UK and have a swipe at the country from abroad.

Bit like that Charlie Mullins fella who seems to delight in his comments on the state of a nation he loves so much he moves away.

It's really easy in life to say what you don't agree with than fight for what you do.
Click to expand...

Not sure who he is conning if he is a "grifter". He takes a swipe at the state apparatus because he knows the country he loves can be run in a better way for its people. Nowt wrong with that.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
You attack the BBC for a full report on a court case which produced a result you approve of?

He would have been charged in his real name so it’s obvious that was how it must be reported.

It’s also obvious he was stopped because of who he is. The police would be failing in their duty should they not be alert when previous offenders passed them. That the Judge was unwilling to convict him of a terrorism offence was hardly surprising given both the high bar that needed to be cleared and the expensive barrister provided by his backer.

Does that make him credible? It’s incredible that you think it might!
Click to expand...

How many other people are ever reported with "real name...."? Would love to know.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
You attack the BBC for a full report on a court case which produced a result you approve of?

He would have been charged in his real name so it’s obvious that was how it must be reported.

It’s also obvious he was stopped because of who he is. The police would be failing in their duty should they not be alert when previous offenders passed them. That the Judge was unwilling to convict him of a terrorism offence was hardly surprising given both the high bar that needed to be cleared and the expensive barrister provided by his backer.

Does that make him credible? It’s incredible that you think it might!
Click to expand...
Tosh. It is quite obvious this was a stitch up, you think the Anti Terror police at ports, stop every previous offender. They are interested in those that may be involved or have been involved in terrorist activities. Please enlighten when TR fell into thise categories. The judge was spot on in his summing up, what did happen about his alleged assault at a train station? Oh yes, nothing
As an example of how this was over the top. Many years ago I was on passport control and Gerry Adams came to my desk, of course the CT police knew of his arrival and port of embarkation, they didn’t even speak to him or acknowledge his arrival. How times/ policing has changed
 
Great news. Great summary from the Judge. At least there seems to be a bit of distance between the judiciary and politics in this case. However, the police actions were likely politically motivated, as even the Judge thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top