• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Tommy Robinson

....isn't it a shame those laws, protecting young girls, were ignored ? ignored wholesale ?

Ignored By the perpetrators. And also ignored by those taking a salary to protect the public.

They weren’t ignored by the forces of law and order. They were either not detected by them or not sufficient evidence was available to mount a successful prosecution.

In Y-L’s case he almost invited prosecution and then pleaded guilty.
 
Only if it’s decided he can be safely housed there. Not to punish him more. If that’s the only place with suitable facilities for someone who presents unique problems then so be it.
HM Prison Belmarsh is a category A prison containing some of the UK’s most dangerous and high profile criminals. Being one of the UK’s most secure prisons, it is often used to contain prisoners in cases where national security is threatened.
 
They weren’t ignored by the forces of law and order. They were either not detected by them or not sufficient evidence was available to mount a successful prosecution.

In Y-L’s case he almost invited prosecution and then pleaded guilty.
I’m sorry but your first paragraph is nonsense. It has been long known that no action was taken “ for the sake of racial harmony” Jack Straw intimated it years ago
 
They weren’t ignored by the forces of law and order. They were either not detected by them or not sufficient evidence was available to mount a successful prosecution.

In Y-L’s case he almost invited prosecution and then pleaded guilty.
I know you haven’t watched the ‘Silenced’ documentary so I’ll tell you again. Teachers, staff and pupils were all interviewed and many gave accounts of the pupil in question. NDA Non Disclosure Agreements were signed and payments were made along with the closure of the school. One girl was assaulted with a bat on her back and is receiving ongoing treatment and one of the girls, maybe the same girl, gave her account in between her studies for a law degree.

You can either claim TR continued with this to engineer whatever or it was out of principle. The authorities want him to remove the video from social media. As a result the video is being watched by more people and is being shared and posted by many.
 
I suspect the vast majority are “asylum seekers” who wanted a better life away from oppressive regimes. LOL

Oppressive Regimes ? what is that ? would it involve.....

- censorship
- sexual violence
- other violence

- no go zones
- lazy feckers living a better life than the minimum-wage man ?
- religious intolerance

- Pay the infidel Tax
- women being treated like the private property of their custodian male family members.

- AntiSemitism, homophobia, etc.......

Oh well, aren't we lucky those problems are all contained in those dodgy countries, and not growing here ?

 
Last edited:
Oppressive Regimes ? what is that ? would it involve.....

- censorship
- sexual violence
- other violence

- no go zones
- lazy feckers living a better life than the minimum-wage man ?
- religious intolerance

- Pay the infidel Tax
- women being treated like the private property of their custodian male family members.

- AntiSemitism, homophobia, etc.......

Oh well, aren't we lucky those problems are all contained in those dodgy countries, and not growing here ?

Well done to him for dealing with the attacker but there is a quicker way. Clear his lines…
 
This is one of the most perplexing questions in the modern day.
They want what you have, more money and better lifestyle than where they come from....not a different culture.

They don't care about connecting the dots....a few can, most don't.

You can take the boy out of the ghetto....
 
Last edited:
HM Prison Belmarsh is a category A prison containing some of the UK’s most dangerous and high profile criminals. Being one of the UK’s most secure prisons, it is often used to contain prisoners in cases where national security is threatened.
I think most understand all of that. If he gets sent there it won’t be because of his crime. It will be because of who he is and the need to both keep him safe and to manage the disruption him being in any jail will cause.
 
I think most understand all of that. If he gets sent there it won’t be because of his crime. It will be because of who he is and the need to both keep him safe and to manage the disruption him being in any jail will cause.
Belmarsh :
ok, so nothing to do with 'making an example of' a gobby bloke with a big mouth ?
 
I know you haven’t watched the ‘Silenced’ documentary so I’ll tell you again. Teachers, staff and pupils were all interviewed and many gave accounts of the pupil in question. NDA Non Disclosure Agreements were signed and payments were made along with the closure of the school. One girl was assaulted with a bat on her back and is receiving ongoing treatment and one of the girls, maybe the same girl, gave her account in between her studies for a law degree.

You can either claim TR continued with this to engineer whatever or it was out of principle. The authorities want him to remove the video from social media. As a result the video is being watched by more people and is being shared and posted by many.
You are right about something. I haven’t, and won’t, watch a video made by Y-L. I regard it as unedited propaganda from someone with a very obvious agenda. Anything funded by the disgusting Alex Jones must be suspect. Are those claims true? Are they really genuinely who they claim to be? I don’t know. Do you or do you take things at face value? I prefer proper journalism, with editors and lawyers checking that claims are authentic.

More importantly does it matter? He has been found guilty in a Court of Law and ordered to stop spreading claims held to be false. Which he failed to do, was then charged with contempt, pleaded guilty and been jailed.

The Judge, via his defence barrister, would have been aware of these claims but rejected them. Perhaps the boy wasn’t popular. Perhaps the school is full of racist xenophobic bigots. The Judge is in a better position than us to decide and has. The law has spoken. I listen to it. Y-L doesn’t. He holds it in contempt. Do you?
 
You are right about something. I haven’t, and won’t, watch a video made by Y-L. I regard it as unedited propaganda from someone with a very obvious agenda. Anything funded by the disgusting Alex Jones must be suspect. Are those claims true? Are they really genuinely who they claim to be? I don’t know. Do you or do you take things at face value? I prefer proper journalism, with editors and lawyers checking that claims are authentic.

More importantly does it matter? He has been found guilty in a Court of Law and ordered to stop spreading claims held to be false. Which he failed to do, was then charged with contempt, pleaded guilty and been jailed.

The Judge, via his defence barrister, would have been aware of these claims but rejected them. Perhaps the boy wasn’t popular. Perhaps the school is full of racist xenophobic bigots. The Judge is in a better position than us to decide and has. The law has spoken. I listen to it. Y-L doesn’t. He holds it in contempt. Do you?
You can’t comment on something you haven’t seen. It would be like reporting on a football match without watching it.

Does it matter? Hmm. Yes. The charge is linked to the point the establishment deciding it’s all lies.

And there’s another thing you don’t know from not watching it. He got hold of the boy’s school file. I’d like an independent review, if there is such a thing, of the whole thing.
 
At least we know now why Robinson decided to give himself up and be locked away for 18 months. Clear the powers-that-be need the main figurehead out of the picture when they announce the piece of s*** who killed those three little innocents up in Southport has been charged under the terrorism act.

If you think you could not hate the likes of Starmer and co anymore than you do then think again. You can, and should hate them even more than you do already. And I suspect its only going to get worse, as the story emerges. Drip fed.
 
You can’t comment on something you haven’t seen. It would be like reporting on a football match without watching it.

Does it matter? Hmm. Yes. The charge is linked to the point the establishment deciding it’s all lies.

And there’s another thing you don’t know from not watching it. He got hold of the boy’s school file. I’d like an independent review, if there is such a thing, of the whole thing.
I am not commenting on the video! I am commenting on who made it, who financed it and the claims you made for it. Without being able to check these things yourself you need to trust the producer to tell you if it is a work of fiction or a report on true events. I wouldn’t trust Y-L to clean my toilet.

The Judge has determined the case, based on the law which gives the accused every opportunity to explain themselves. You either trust our system or you don’t. I do.

There has been an independent review. It’s called a court case. Appeals are permitted.
 
At least we know now why Robinson decided to give himself up and be locked away for 18 months. Clear the powers-that-be need the main figurehead out of the picture when they announce the piece of s*** who killed those three little innocents up in Southport has been charged under the terrorism act.

If you think you could not hate the likes of Starmer and co anymore than you do then think again. You can, and should hate them even more than you do already. And I suspect its only going to get worse, as the story emerges. Drip fed.
Still saying the murders were not terror related. WTAF
 
Still saying the murders were not terror related. WTAF


Drip feeding it out. They simply could not cover up the other s***. Makes me wonder what else might be out there? Possible Jihadi style video message? Other stuff?

All I know is that this is the Establishment in FULL containment mode. This is how these fucks do it.
 
I am not commenting on the video! I am commenting on who made it, who financed it and the claims you made for it. Without being able to check these things yourself you need to trust the producer to tell you if it is a work of fiction or a report on true events. I wouldn’t trust Y-L to clean my toilet.

The Judge has determined the case, based on the law which gives the accused every opportunity to explain themselves. You either trust our system or you don’t. I do.

There has been an independent review. It’s called a court case. Appeals are permitted.
You should watch the video where he exposed the head reporter for BBC’s panorama. You’d probably trust him, hey?

I was talking about an independent review into the whole school incident, not the contempt of court, which they wouldn’t review.
 
Back
Top