The bbc, again.


Oops, all those who said nothing to see here after last week's revelations. In that case why has the BBC removed the offending pages.
It's no news the BBC is stuffed with lefties.

The news is the management considered the stuff to be political and removed it.

If it was the organisation you all think it was, they would have considered and (genuinely) reported nothing to see.
 
It's no news the BBC is stuffed with lefties.

The news is the management considered the stuff to be political and removed it.

If it was the organisation you all think it was, they would have considered and (genuinely) reported nothing to see.
They only did it when complaints started mounting up. They hardly did it due to some kind of change of heart or tactic.
 
Another good use of the licence fee. Still no admission of any wrongdoing

Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
 
Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
Seeing as they paid off convicted paedophiles, I think it's pretty safe to presume they paid her off.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top