The bbc, again.

Badger11 said:
www.dailymail.com

BBC schools website takes down Leftist views

The BBC was accused of 'brainwashing' children after Bitesize encouraged them to play an online game that rewarded them for choosing 'open borders'.
www.dailymail.com www.dailymail.com

Oops, all those who said nothing to see here after last week's revelations. In that case why has the BBC removed the offending pages.
Click to expand...
It's no news the BBC is stuffed with lefties.

The news is the management considered the stuff to be political and removed it.

If it was the organisation you all think it was, they would have considered and (genuinely) reported nothing to see.
 
silvertop said:
It's no news the BBC is stuffed with lefties.

The news is the management considered the stuff to be political and removed it.

If it was the organisation you all think it was, they would have considered and (genuinely) reported nothing to see.
Click to expand...
They only did it when complaints started mounting up. They hardly did it due to some kind of change of heart or tactic.
 
Spiderman said:
Another good use of the licence fee. Still no admission of any wrongdoing

www.dailymail.com

BBC must 'pay £400k to Jewish producer after anti-Semitism claims'

Lucie Kon claimed she was mistreated by BBC colleagues who said Zionists like her were 'evil' in the wake of the October 7 Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel.
www.dailymail.com www.dailymail.com
Click to expand...
Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
 
orpingtoneagle said:
Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
Click to expand...
Seeing as they paid off convicted paedophiles, I think it's pretty safe to presume they paid her off.
 
paying off paedophiles is extremely low.

paying off a supporter of terrorism and genocide goes way under the bar.

And this is why the BBC is sheite. Because reporting (all the) facts is not about opinion.
 
orpingtoneagle said:
Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
Click to expand...
Yup shoot the messenger. I first saw this story in the Telegraph I think they are the source, anyway they have an interview with her. If you google it you will see that a number of media outlets are carrying it not just the mail.
 
orpingtoneagle said:
Not sure I would trust the Daily Mail as accurate reporting either. We go from 'must pay,' to 'reportedly' in the space of a line and nowhere does it actually say the figure anywhere else.

Also as tanu money would be paid out side a tribunal it would be subject to a NDA so no one would know!
Click to expand...
Ah! The old it’s only the Mail argument. 🤣
 
Spiderman said:
Ah! The old it’s only the Mail argument. 🤣
Click to expand...
It might well be old but it’s been true for many years and is still true today. It’s by far the worst newspaper. Not because it is written badly. It is written well. It’s because it appears authentic but subtly spins stories to deceive its well meaning and intelligent readership with the intention to pursue the political agenda of the owners.

I once had a friend who was a senior sub editor for the Mail. He is now retired. They had a format for exactly how stories were chosen and presented. It was handed down from above. His personal politics were pretty socialist but as a well paid professional that didn’t stop him from doing his job. Something I couldn’t have done. The Mail isn’t a newspaper. It’s a daily propaganda bulletin.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It might well be old but it’s been true for many years and is still true today. It’s by far the worst newspaper. Not because it is written badly. It is written well. It’s because it appears authentic but subtly spins stories to deceive its well meaning and intelligent readership with the intention to pursue the political agenda of the owners.

I once had a friend who was a senior sub editor for the Mail. He is now retired. They had a format for exactly how stories were chosen and presented. It was handed down from above. His personal politics were pretty socialist but as a well paid professional that didn’t stop him from doing his job. Something I couldn’t have done. The Mail isn’t a newspaper. It’s a daily propaganda bulletin.
Click to expand...
And that's exactly how many people feel about the BBC.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It might well be old but it’s been true for many years and is still true today. It’s by far the worst newspaper. Not because it is written badly. It is written well. It’s because it appears authentic but subtly spins stories to deceive its well meaning and intelligent readership with the intention to pursue the political agenda of the owners.

I once had a friend who was a senior sub editor for the Mail. He is now retired. They had a format for exactly how stories were chosen and presented. It was handed down from above. His personal politics were pretty socialist but as a well paid professional that didn’t stop him from doing his job. Something I couldn’t have done. The Mail isn’t a newspaper. It’s a daily propaganda bulletin.
Click to expand...
More authentic than the law firms dressing up claims on a no win no fee basis, lose and are insolvent?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top