But you judge US politics and media 🤔Another US based organisation, this one founded by someone who was previously a Republican administrator.
In the US they even think the Democrats are left wing and not simply more liberal than Republicans! So hardly fit to judge our media.
AllSides - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The bbc, again.
- Topic starter Eagleman13
- Start date
cryrst
Member
- Location
- The garden of England
- Country
England
It’s all about the context
incoming 😂
The following article is why I do not have blind trust n anything the BBC reports:
www.bbc.com
The headline state the path is open, great. But read through the article and only 80% is actually open and the rest expected by the end of the year. Why not put that in the headline?
And don't get me started on the BBC Verified. I would have thought that everything they post, as a news broadcaster, would have been verified before being put out, but now I can only assume that anything that isn't verified must only be speculation and contain assumptions.
World's longest coastal path opens in England to the public
The King Charles coastal path will allow walkers right of access to the entire coast for the first time.
www.bbc.com
The headline state the path is open, great. But read through the article and only 80% is actually open and the rest expected by the end of the year. Why not put that in the headline?
And don't get me started on the BBC Verified. I would have thought that everything they post, as a news broadcaster, would have been verified before being put out, but now I can only assume that anything that isn't verified must only be speculation and contain assumptions.
The Verified unit is there to check up on other media outlets especially social media, it's not their to verify the BBC output. Which is why I don't trust it. They pick holes in other people's output but look away when it's theirs.The following article is why I do not have blind trust n anything the BBC reports:
World's longest coastal path opens in England to the public
The King Charles coastal path will allow walkers right of access to the entire coast for the first time.
The headline state the path is open, great. But read through the article and only 80% is actually open and the rest expected by the end of the year. Why not put that in the headline?
And don't get me started on the BBC Verified. I would have thought that everything they post, as a news broadcaster, would have been verified before being put out, but now I can only assume that anything that isn't verified must only be speculation and contain assumptions.
They said nothing about the Panorama programme and when finally did comment it was to point out the above.
Of course they blindly ignored the fact that that scandal was wildly reported across social media and MSM so they should have verified it if not from the BBC side then that MSM and SM were reporting the facts correctly.
The BBC has demonstrated many time that it is not to be trusted in marking it's own homework.