Southport

[Wisbech Eagle]

No because Lucy Connolly is, apparently, an unapologetic racist, whereas Jo Brand is a left wing “ commediene” so her comments should be taken as a joke.
WE last few posts on here sums up what I had previously said. How anyone can make an excuse for JB comments when he has admitted she has an intense dislike for him, beggars belief

I am not excusing her!

It was bad taste, but it was only a joke told in bad taste. Without the potential to incite.

Unlike the behaviour of Connolly. Not in my opinion, but that of the Judge who considered it.

 

[cryrst]

He is an ex President of South Africa who now leads a minority party. The government, and the ANC, have moved on from those sentiments which are rooted in the dark days of apartheid. The song now being classified as hate speech and banned from use by the ANC.

Neither Jeremy Corbyn nor Nigel Farage speak for the UK so why should any songs they might sing at rallies be seen as reflecting government policy?

Most don’t speak for Gaza but constantly sing about it !

 

[Spiderman]

I am not excusing her!

It was bad taste, but it was only a joke told in bad taste. Without the potential to incite.

Unlike the behaviour of Connolly. Not in my opinion, but that of the Judge who considered it.

Maybe a judge would have opined that JB was inciting hatred but, of course, no action was taken against her.

 

[ASCPFC]

Yle sources: History of violence in Pirkkala school stabbing suspect's family

The 16-year-old suspected of stabbing three young girls at a school in Pirkkala earlier this week has no prior criminal record, but has been the subject of a protective restraining order.

yle.fi

 

[georgenorman]

Maybe a judge would have opined that JB was inciting hatred but, of course, no action was taken against her.

Whereas Carol Thatcher was sacked for making a joke about a jam jar label.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Maybe a judge would have opined that JB was inciting hatred but, of course, no action was taken against her.

Why was that?

Perhaps because the CPS knew there was no case to answer?

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Why was that?

Perhaps because the CPS knew there was no case to answer?

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

No.

The CPS decide on the facts and the law.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

No.

The CPS decide on the facts and the law.

So what? Still the post hoc fallacy in action.

 

[ASCPFC]

No.

The CPS decide on the facts and the law.

That is not how the CPS work at all. Have an actual look into it. They are neither the facts nor the law.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

So what? Still the post hoc fallacy in action.

Sorry but I see nothing fallacious involved. That neither event had any connection to the other is beside the point. They were compared, so were answered.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Sorry but I see nothing fallacious involved. That neither event had any connection to the other is beside the point. They were compared, so were answered.

The fallacy is in the justification. The Latin speaks for itself.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

That is not how the CPS work at all. Have an actual look into it. They are neither the facts nor the law.

The CPS determine the probability of a successful prosecution alongside whether any doubt about the outcome is overridden by the public interest. Facts and the law being key to both.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

The fallacy is in the justification. The Latin speaks for itself.

Who do think justified what?

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Who do think justified what?

I think you're scrabbling to justify a decision after the fact. As usual.

 

[Stirlingsays]

When people on the left mock the idea of 'two tier' justice from our institutionally liberal anti white judiciary even after Southport exposed this to mass public consciousness.....something for which Labour will pay for at the ballot box....have a little reminder here of the huge and vicious disparity between how these self regarding traitors treat a normie like Lisa Connolly and how they treat an actual repeating sex offender.

Remember that next time they mock 'two tier'.

 

[Spiderman]

When people on the left mock the idea of 'two tier' justice from our institutionally liberal anti white judiciary even after Southport exposed this to mass public consciousness.....something for which Labour will pay for at the ballot box....have a little reminder here of the huge and vicious disparity between how these self regarding traitors treat a normie like Lisa Connolly and how they treat an actual repeating sex offender.

Remember that next time they mock 'two tier'.

View attachment 1224

I’m sure you will be informed shortly that the courts know more than us and the “ punishment “ would have been set accordingly. Sex offenders and paedos seem to have been given carte blanche to carry on without the threat of jail time,

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

When people on the left mock the idea of 'two tier' justice from our institutionally liberal anti white judiciary even after Southport exposed this to mass public consciousness.....something for which Labour will pay for at the ballot box....have a little reminder here of the huge and vicious disparity between how these self regarding traitors treat a normie like Lisa Connolly and how they treat an actual repeating sex offender.

Remember that next time they mock 'two tier'.

View attachment 1224

What a load of biased garbage.

Lisa Connolly is no “normie”. Justice is blind to the colour of those accused, or wronged.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I’m sure you will be informed shortly that the courts know more than us and the “ punishment “ would have been set accordingly. Sex offenders and paedos seem to have been given carte blanche to carry on without the threat of jail time,

They certainly have the evidence and the reports which enable them to decide the appropriate course of action. Which isn’t always jail.

That’s why the reports are prepared and defence attorneys exist.

 

[ASCPFC]

They certainly have the evidence and the reports which enable them to decide the appropriate course of action. Which isn’t always jail.

That’s why the reports are prepared and defence attorneys exist.

First time offenders require leeway and repeat offenders require an actual deterrent wouldn't you think? That's how it's always worked until now. Did you see the policy change?