Russell Brand

[Hrolf The Ganger]

Why does the sex of the rape victim matter to the argument..? That bullshit culture war bingo is not relevant.

Accusing others of not caring about women's safety while you actively defend a convicted rapist is an interesting take.

You are amazingly thick.

Questioning a conviction is not defending a rapist. The conviction is what makes him a rapist.
By contrast, supporting an ideology that allows dangerous criminals to be released from prison early or arrive on boats and move into your neighbourhood shows a complete disregard for the safety of women and girls.

 

[eaglesdare]

You are amazingly thick.

Questioning a conviction is not defending a rapist. The conviction is what makes him a rapist.
By contrast, supporting an ideology that allows dangerous criminals to be released from prison early or arrive on boats and move into your neighbourhood shows a complete disregard for the safety of women and girls.

He is literally putting words into people's mouths. Same old same old.

I don't think many on here if any are defending brand or his actions. They are simply asking the question if the trial was fair and free from prejudice.

 

[hackney-viking-eagle]

Hilarious how many 'save our girls' patriots are now vehemently defending a man who used to send his BBC driver to the school gates to pick up girls. Literal schoolgirls. And Walliams - messaging 15 year old fans and arranging dates. Seriously. Have a word with yourselves.

 

[Part Time James]

The verdict on him was in years ago and it wasn't at all surprising. Like him winning the Bellend d'Or it was nailed on.

Wasn't he acquitted because they thought the accuser was making it up?

 

[CPFCSaturn]

You are amazingly thick.

Questioning a conviction is not defending a rapist. The conviction is what makes him a rapist.
By contrast, supporting an ideology that allows dangerous criminals to be released from prison early or arrive on boats and move into your neighbourhood shows a complete disregard for the safety of women and girls.

Abusive as ever, from a total moron who can’t hold a thought in his head without it involving immigrants.

You are absolutely defending a rapist.

Chomped down on yet another grifter who views your lot as easy prey to exploit.

Maybe one day the penny will drop, but you’re probably too thick to ever see it.

 

[CPFCSaturn]

He is literally putting words into people's mouths. Same old same old.

I don't think many on here if any are defending brand or his actions. They are simply asking the question if the trial was fair and free from prejudice.

You’re all desperately trying to prove the ‘innocence’ of a rapist and sexual abuser - that is very clearly defending him.

Own what you are.

 

[silvertop]

This is a message board. People are entitled to opinions.

However, they could be total liars about their qualifications/experiences.

Yes, and I was politely asking him based on his personal experience as a police detective whether he believes the convictions were unsafe.

I am genuinely interested in his view.

You saw attack where there was none