Reparations

On the point about modern slavery in the UK I do wonder if the numbers are distorted. Migrants who claim to have been trafficked almost always are allowed to stay. So I wonder if the ambulance chasing lawyers encourage people down that route.

I am not saying there isn't people trafficking but just like the "gay" loophole the numbers maybe exaggerated.
 
Give her a history lesson and explain who sold the slaves in the first place, probably many from her own country… then tell her to f*** kff


They can smell how weak our institutions are, they smell blood.

Commonwealth countries have greatly benefited from British rule, their life outcomes are far far better than had we never been involved at all.
 
On the point about modern slavery in the UK I do wonder if the numbers are distorted. Migrants who claim to have been trafficked almost always are allowed to stay. So I wonder if the ambulance chasing lawyers encourage people down that route.

I am not saying there isn't people trafficking but just like the "gay" loophole the numbers maybe exaggerated.
Yes very much so
 
On the point about modern slavery in the UK I do wonder if the numbers are distorted. Migrants who claim to have been trafficked almost always are allowed to stay. So I wonder if the ambulance chasing lawyers encourage people down that route.

I am not saying there isn't people trafficking but just like the "gay" loophole the numbers maybe exaggerated.
They are told to do it, because it gives them cause for appeal which is how they actually get to stay under the current UK system.

If that data I've read on it is accurate (Refugee Council and BBC), then the scam runs so that the initial rejection is fairly high with "only" something in the area of 40% being approved. The scam is that 66% of the appeals are successful. So the government can honestly say, "We are rejecting initial claims at the highest rate in decades" while in reality roughly the same numbers are coming in over all, they just had to appeal the initial decision.
 
So we're importing slaves and slave culture by Muslims then, but will the guardian mention it?
Your pattern recognition is racist.

Fun Fact of the day, more African slaves went to the Middle East and India then went to the Americas but there are no Africans of slave descent in either the Middle East and India.
 
Your pattern recognition is racist.

Fun Fact of the day, more African slaves went to the Middle East and India then went to the Americas but there are no Africans of slave descent in either the Middle East and India.

300,000 Vs 15,000,000

And they were castrated meaning about 30% just bled out
 
Portugal must be well in the frame since they were responsible for transporting 5.8 m slaves to Brazil compared to 3.3 m from Britain to America and the Caribbean.
Portugal were the first nation to establish the Atlantic slave trade.
Britain were comparatively late comers although we did come to dominate for the 70 years prior to 1807 when Britain banned the trade -and spent the next 80 years -at considerable expense - imposing their ban on other nations slavers - using The Royal Navy.
 
Your pattern recognition is racist.

Fun Fact of the day, more African slaves went to the Middle East and India then went to the Americas but there are no Africans of slave descent in either the Middle East and India.
Don't know about India but with the Arabs their slave total is eye watering compared to the number shipped to the Americas. And the reason there is no black population is because the Arabs by way of long standing tradition castrated EVERY male without anaesthetic.
 
Portugal were the first nation to establish the Atlantic slave trade.
Britain were comparatively late comers although we did come to dominate for the 70 years prior to 1807 when Britain banned the trade -and spent the next 80 years -at considerable expense - imposing their ban on other nations slavers - using The Royal Navy.
In 1815 Britain paid Portugal £300,000 for a pledge to abolish their slavery trade involvement by 1830 (£300,000 in modern values is perhaps around £28 million).
 
Don't know about India but with the Arabs their slave total is eye watering compared to the number shipped to the Americas. And the reason there is no black population is because the Arabs by way of long standing tradition castrated EVERY male without anaesthetic.

30% bled to death
 
Commonwealth countries have greatly benefited from British rule, their life outcomes are far far better than had we never been involved at all.
can you define 'commonwealth country'.......often the native tribes of the Caribbean got annihilated to make way for slave ships.

Australian aboriginals equally got sidelined by a tsunami of newcomers. Nigel and Sharon arriving in to take over the place. Sure mate, commonwealth countries benefited greatly.

Meanwhile many countries today have slavery alive and well. See below.

 
Last edited:
Don't know about India but with the Arabs their slave total is eye watering compared to the number shipped to the Americas. And the reason there is no black population is because the Arabs by way of long standing tradition castrated EVERY male without anaesthetic.
By the best estimates:
- African slaves that went the Americas (Primarily Central and South America): Roughly 12 Million
- African slaves that went to the US: 400,000
- African slaves that went to the Middle East: Guesses come in between 10-14 Million.

Most Middle East estimates also tend to include India as well.

Absolutely on the castration. Add in poor living conditions and it is of no surprise they just disappear.
 
Rap you mean. All that whinging, or saying how wealthy and successful they are yet then at the same moment telling us how the system is racist and against them
Oprah Winfrey being a prime example, obviously not regarding rap. A multi multi millionaire, owns a home in the Bahamas but still loves to dig out White privilege
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top