Reform

The only selfish perspective is that we are neither of us spring chickens. We have seen better times.

My kids are 11 and 16. I fear for their future.

You are right to, I have two pre-teen boys myself and also fear for their future.

Even if we ignore the whole political aspects of the future...the unrealistic pseudo communism of the young and the selfish boomerism of the old.....the age realities of the future mean that it's robotics or bust.....Well, it'll be bust until the transition to robotics and AI that are actually good enough.

What is in it for the youth? The average and below average make up by far the majority....They can't just be offered sh1te poverty with a subscription future.

That's a future filled with its own scary possibilities.

1788518208668.webp
 
‘Scammed’ by using their own words on film.
The desperate measures of a failing establishment who have lost the argument.

Only an imbecile is fooled or remotely concerned with this obvious ploy when the country is on its knees.
 
Last edited:
Hardly analogous.

Ban journalists by all means.

But ban them all.

Cherry picking the voices you approve smacks of a party which, when in government, will exercise strict media control.

Is that what you want?
Why ban all journalists? Just ban those who are attending your conference merely to attack you.
 
I still fail to see how Reform, following UKIP has progressed much beyond a single-issue, protest party? A one trick pony outfit.

The worrying implications that they 'have big plans' is all this funding coming from dubious sources. They seem to have attracted a bunch of disgruntled and past their sell-by-date Tories to try and give them a veneer of serviceability but if you look what they are doing to councils - they are clearly inept in a field where you just have to learn to breathe through your nose and parse local issues.

Farage is a very able hype-man but well out of his depth as an MP, as the ludicrous deflection of the recent by-election shows. As he continues to be investigated, I can only imagine he will be replaced in next few months.
 
Why ban all journalists? Just ban those who are attending your conference merely to attack you.
We can't talk about journalists like they are some sacred animal. Some are simply part of the political circus. They actually create stories for their target audience and aid their political movement at the same time.
 
Why ban all journalists? Just ban those who are attending your conference merely to attack you.
That is an indication of weakness.

I had no idea Reform were so sensitive, fragile and unable to defend themselves against criticism.

However, regardless of their frailties, by cherry picking only those outlets who like them, that sets a worrying tone for the press control / censorship they will deploy once in power.

Direct, once more, from the Trump playbook. Do they have any original ideas?
 
That is an indication of weakness.

I had no idea Reform were so sensitive, fragile and unable to defend themselves against criticism.

However, regardless of their frailties, by cherry picking only those outlets who like them, that sets a worrying tone for the press control / censorship they will deploy once in power.

Direct, once more, from the Trump playbook. Do they have any original ideas?

It's not uniquely "Trump's playbook" it's pretty much standard political practice that the Tories and Labour have used too.

Some examples:

"Journalists from Declassified UK have been barred from attending Labour’s conference in Liverpool this week"


"Rishi sunak bans reporters"


Here's an old news article from 1998 from labour banning the press which predates Trump's 2 terms in office:

 
It's not uniquely "Trump's playbook" it's pretty much standard political practice that the Tories and Labour have used too.

Some examples:

"Journalists from Declassified UK have been barred from attending Labour’s conference in Liverpool this week"


"Rishi sunak bans reporters"


Here's an old news article from 1998 from labour banning the press which predates Trump's 2 terms in office:

Oops!

How awkward for the resident lame brained leftists.
 
It's not uniquely "Trump's playbook" it's pretty much standard political practice that the Tories and Labour have used too.

Some examples:

"Journalists from Declassified UK have been barred from attending Labour’s conference in Liverpool this week"


"Rishi sunak bans reporters"


Here's an old news article from 1998 from labour banning the press which predates Trump's 2 terms in office:

Rishi banned everyone. Fine.

The BBC ban took some searching!

But the Declassified one is interesting as it did not pop up on my cursory Wiki search. There was the MoD issue over arms sale to the Saudis - something the government had to back pedal furiously from - but no denial of access to the conference.

Perhaps they have only limited press passes available? Declassified are hardly The Times.
 
Rishi banned everyone. Fine.

The BBC ban took some searching!

But the Declassified one is interesting as it did not pop up on my cursory Wiki search. There was the MoD issue over arms sale to the Saudis - something the government had to back pedal furiously from - but no denial of access to the conference.

Perhaps they have only limited press passes available? Declassified are hardly The Times.

Perhaps they did have limited press passes. If you don't like the sound of the Declassified one there's plenty of others:





There is probably plenty more if you just Google them. My point is that this just the norm from political party's and not just the "Trump handbook" just look at the 1998 BBC article before Trump ever got into politics.
 
Looks like their tactics in trying to evade the law on donations has been exposed. The one being shown on Channel 4 being a sting and no money actually being transferred but the admissions made are damning and bound to result in investigations.

So no crime, and even if money was transferred it would've been legal.

Another thought crime from the left nutters
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top