It would be great to see a bit of balance on the Politics pages sometimes. On the local elections, no-one would have batted an eyelid about the postponements if Labour had been performing okay in the polls. The argument for delay had some merit, but it was also very politically convenient for Labour, and no doubt both things played a part in the decision. On the other hand it is entirely understandable that with democracy (in the USA) and freedom of speech / thought (in the UK) under attack that the decision would lead to an outraged response from some and disquiet from a lot more. Both positions are valid - there was good reason to delay the elections, and it is understandable that some are very upset by it and interpret it in a certain way.
But God forbid that many posters on here might understand that there is some validity in both sides of the argument. I can't wait for the abuse 🤣