Player ratings v Spurs

[Rogers 11]

Henderson 7
Clyne 5
Mitchell 8
Lerma 7
LaCroix 7
Guehi 7
Wharton 8
Hughes 7
Deveny 6
Pino 2
Mateta 5
Nketiah 6
Uche 6
Esse 4

 

[Adrift]

Henderson 7
Clyne 5
Mitchell 8
Lerma 7
LaCroix 7
Guehi 7
Wharton 8
Hughes 7
Deveny 6
Pino 2
Mateta 5
Nketiah 6
Uche 6
Esse 4

Bit harsh on Pino

Palace MoM: VAR ref, the only bugger marking Richarlison

 

[ASCPFC]

I can't be bothered to rank them.

 

[Dogburger]

Henderson 7
Clyne 5
Mitchell 8
Lerma 7
LaCroix 7
Guehi 7
Wharton 8
Hughes 7
Deveny 6
Pino 2
Mateta 5
Nketiah 6
Uche 6
Esse 4

Id give them all a 7 first half ,Wharton 8 . And Id give them all a 6 second half with a couple of 5's for Mateta and Pino .

The set piece coach gets 3 and Glasner 6

 

[Palacesince64]

Henderson 7
Clyne 5
Mitchell 8
Lerma 7
LaCroix 7
Guehi 7
Wharton 8
Hughes 7
Deveny 6
Pino 2
Mateta 5
Nketiah 6
Uche 6
Esse 4

Don’t think Mitchell was an 8 today, in fact no one was more than a 6. Pino maybe a 3 along with Mateta.

 

[sprites]

Wharton and Hughes both worthy of 8s. Everyone else a mix of 5-7s.

 

[OneStevePerrin]

Mateta deserves the lowest points score of them all. And that’s the main problem as he is pivotal to the team performance. Not only is he not scoring but he’s control and hold up play is non existent. He can’t win a ball which means he can’t play others in. Glasner obviously doesn’t rate Nketia or Uche in that role otherwise one of them would be starting. Is Glasner wrong or us fans wanting them to be given a chance in that position? With results so bad at the moment why does he keep selecting a player so badly out of form?