Stats wise it flattered them, not that they didn't deserve a win, although much of our play came when it was all over.
2 events: Sarr passing wide to Munoz not the touch forward right to Mateta was TERRIBLE. He was in and would've likely buried it, at 0-0. And Eze's awful penalty, I knew he'd miss and called it. But it must be on Glasner because he should know that you DON'T LET CONFIDENCE PLAYERS TAKE PENALTIES. You need the mentality of a tour golfer, a numb mind to the past, and that's why JP bangs them in. Maybe a different outcome.
Then out of their 7 on target they score 5, with a total xG of a paltry 1.54 (less than our xG), that's nearly as ridiculous as when they drew at ours 1-1 with 1 off target shot. I think that their second summed it up, shooting from a crazy angle and it was in, nobody expected that especially on the pattern of play with the constant crossing.
Over the course of the game though Glasner was tactically beaten. They played 4-3-3 and occupied our back 3, then used the width on the break whilst Mitchell and Munoz were up the pitch. Glasner must've played Lerma instead of Wharton for more bit in the middle because of that middle 3, but it didn't work at all, we had less bite into them because Lerma is a bad passer (not that Wharton had a good game). Our passing out was really bad, and relied on hope a lot, so we invited pressure on ourselves and we got deep because their breaks wide were so dangerous. I can't help but think that we actually NEEDED a formation change for this game - Rock, Paper, Scissors - the 4-3-3 is a big counter to 3-4-3, I'd have matched it or played 4-5-1.