Makerfield by election

georgenorman said:
Well, if you think being unlawful is ok 'at times', you must think it is a matter of choice for people rather than inherently right or wrong.
Click to expand...
I think it might be alright to smoke some puff, for instance, even though it's not legal.

Or, if people illegally block traffic or thoroughfares, for instance.

Enough sitting on the fence, mate; do you think setting fire to people's home, willy nilly, on account of them being of a different nationality or skin colour is acceptable? Would you call that 'inherently wrong'?

Would you condone it?
 
Glazier#1 said:
I think it might be alright to smoke some puff, for instance, even though it's not legal.

Or, if people illegally block traffic or thoroughfares, for instance.

Enough sitting on the fence, mate; do you think setting fire to people's home, willy nilly, on account of them being of a different nationality or skin colour is acceptable? Would you call that 'inherently wrong'?

Would you condone it?
Click to expand...
Do you condone it?
 
Glazier#1 said:
I think it might be alright to smoke some puff, for instance, even though it's not legal.

Or, if people illegally block traffic or thoroughfares, for instance.

Enough sitting on the fence, mate; do you think setting fire to people's home, willy nilly, on account of them being of a different nationality or skin colour is acceptable? Would you call that 'inherently wrong'?

Would you condone it?
Click to expand...
I am against law-breaking.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
Farage has the 6th most appearances in the history of Question Time, and I believe the most in the 21st century.

He’s probably the most overrepresented guest in the shows long history.

If not being on the panel is proof that the BBC hate Lowe/Restore… then they bloody well love Farage.
Click to expand...
Trying to catch him out for clicks but he’s too smart for them.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
Farage has the 6th most appearances in the history of Question Time, and I believe the most in the 21st century.

He’s probably the most overrepresented guest in the shows long history.

If not being on the panel is proof that the BBC hate Lowe/Restore… then they bloody well love Farage.
Click to expand...

As you have previously stated you aren't objective.

Farage is second in the polling, of course he should be there.

Besides the point being made is that the party third in the polling wasn't represented, yet parties on apparently 1 percent were.
 
Stirlingsays said:
As you have previously stated you aren't objective.

Farage is second in the polling, of course he should be there.

Besides the point being made is that the party third in the polling wasn't represented, yet parties on apparently 1 percent were.
Click to expand...

No one is objective. Can’t believe you’re still going.

Farage is second in the polling recently - that’s not true of the 21st century as a whole, and he certainly hasn’t been second in the polling for vast majority of his appearances on QT.

Farage’s appearances on the show vastly outweigh more historically popular parties on the left, who have been underrepresented for decades.
 
If Burnham wins this due to Restore splitting the right wing vote then I just hope the Restore brigade finally get the message. This is not about specific policy. It is about direction of travel.

Nothing will be gained if Labour win the next election. It seems inconceivable that it could happen given the farcical nature of their tenure, but it could happen unless the right rally behind one party.

Here's a clue. Restore and the Tories cannot win.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
If Burnham wins this due to Restore splitting the right wing vote then I just hope the Restore brigade finally get the message. This is not about specific policy. It is about direction of travel.

Nothing will be gained if Labour win the next election. It seems inconceivable that it could happen given the farcical nature of their tenure, but it could happen unless the right rally behind one party.

Here's a clue. Restore and the Tories cannot win.
Click to expand...
Probably paid off by someone to split the vote.
 
Seems Reform using Makerfield as a litmus test for the threat level of Restore. If Burnham wins then it points to the local voters not caring that they are being used as a door mat for Burnham's ambition.

Starmer is a busted flush who has nothing in common with or any appeal to the good people of Makerfield.

As someone once said, politics is about events, which now is the resignations from the Defence portfolio and rumours of Yvette Cooper being unsettled.

I don't see Burnham to do anything about the defence crisis, one can only hide behind the sofa at the thought of what his cabinet might look like

There is lowhanging fruit, billions slated for carbon capture and net zero.

Let's see, not long to wait now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top