That all makes a lot of sense.
It is surprising that there is not a piece of available redundant land in the whole of our catchment area that could be used. Sure, land is expensive in the South East but not so much to be prohibitive surely.
I guess football isn't a priority for our local councils. They must have land somewhere they could let go of cheaply to avoid maintenance costs and then help the development process along.
As it is, I expect our current stadium to develop in line with the club's success. If we fill the 35k and keep on an upward trajectory, then there will be pressure to add another 5k to the capacity.