Main Stand redevelopment thread

[mtp1958]

There was something about this during the Jordan reign. Can't remember exactly what. Don't think the club had the rights.

Just looked we was given permission 1990s to build up hence the boxs above , as the new stand will have more boxes , I can't see why we can't remove the boxes and build two extra tiers , but have not seen original plans or agreements , so there maybe a reason ,

 

[Painter]

exactly

West Ham went from 35,000 at Upton Park to 65,000 gates and filled it by selling seats cheaply

obviously their plan was then to increase the prices in later years on once people got used to going - which seems to have worked out despite their supporters constant complaints about hating the stadium - so the plan to build the supporter base has worked - but happily not much else at their club!

If Palace went from 26,000 to 41,000 we could sell those tickets in the premier league with aggressive pricing - but moot point as it'll be years before we get to 34,000 and I doubt we'd need many special offers to sell the extra 8,000 in the PL

West Ham could do that, due to the giveaway deal done by Boris Johnson on the Olympic Stadium. He was desperate to find a use for it and gave it to West Ham for £4m a year rent, now £2m as in Championship.
Thats how they could afford to sell cheap season tickets, Palace aren't in that situation and need to find £200m to pay for buildings, reducing match day revenue is a non starter, if anything the cost of tickets will go up.

 

[TheBigToePunt]

From AI mode.

Yes, Crystal Palace retained the airspace rights allowing them to build over the Whitehorse Lane Sainsbury's store. [1, 2]
When the club faced major financial difficulties around 1980, they sold the patch of land to Sainsbury's for £2 million to ease cash flow. However, the club explicitly retained the building and airspace rights above the supermarket. This unique historical contract allowed them to construct executive boxes directly on top of the store's roof in 1991. [1, 2]
While the current, major stadium expansion focuses entirely on redeveloping the Main Stand (which required buying a separate sliver of the Sainsbury's car park), the airspace rights mean that any future redevelopment of the Whitehorse Lane stand could theoretically see a larger tier built directly over the supermarket

I wonder if it's the space above the whole store we (purportedly) have the rights to, or just the bit we put the boxes on?

A look at the deeds via land registry would perhaps reveal more. If I get a chance I'll take a look at some stage.

If it's true, though, well played Noades!

 

[Casual]

Agree regarding the Arthur.
New roof that doesn’t need posts.
My mate in the away end sent me a picture, couldn’t see the pitch because of the tv gantry.
Can’t see them moving it to the new stand though, as they would want the new stand in camera shot all the time , not looking accross at the Arthur Waite.
surely they could raid the new roof height about 3 meters and have the tv gantry at the back of the stand , or really tight to the front of the roof.

I believe we have the right to build

in the airspace above Sainsbury's. In that case, the only issues would be construction safety, evacuation and building the architecture in a tight space with limited access. The Arthur needs to be upgraded. Remove the stanchions, install a new roof truss and improve facilities. If we have 40K already then the question of increasing its capacity will not arise in the near future.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

I wonder if it's the space above the whole store we (purportedly) have the rights to, or just the bit we put the boxes on?

A look at the deeds via land registry would perhaps reveal more. If I get a chance I'll take a look at some stage.

If it's true, though, well played Noades!

I see nothing in that AI answer to suggest that. Airspace is airspace.

 

[TheBigToePunt]

I see nothing in that AI answer to suggest that. Airspace is airspace.

One world certainly hope so. It does make sense for the club to take that approach back in the day (although it's a surprise to see such a long-sighted approach), and the shape of the supermarket does little to cast doubt on the idea.

I still think it would have been discussed by the club more if it was something they could make use of. The club and ground have been seperated reunited since the original land deal was done, which might have an effect. More to the point, I'm surprised that Parish has never even mentioned it despite all his interviews about the ground and redevelopment etc.

Still, if it's true then that's great.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

One world certainly hope so. It does make sense for the club to take that approach back in the day (although it's a surprise to see such a long-sighted approach), and the shape of the supermarket does little to cast doubt on the idea.

I still think it would have been discussed by the club more if it was something they could make use of. The club and ground have been seperated reunited since the original land deal was done, which might have an effect. More to the point, I'm surprised that Parish has never even mentioned it despite all his interviews about the ground and redevelopment etc.

Still, if it's true then that's great.

The Whitehorse was never going to be prioritized over the Main Stand. I think Parish once suggested that any further upgrades would be left to the next owners.
My opinion is that we will have no choice but to remain in the arms race of stadium building if we are to keep up with our rivals.