Loch Ness Monster

M

McAhuna

Member
Country
England
Very close to being proven as of 2026.

Latest technology all leading to the same conclusion - an unknown massive elongated biological entity
* DNA genetic analysis
* Acoustic Analysis
* Underwater camera sensors


At this point in 2026 sceptics and scoffers just need to find STFU and find somewhere to hide their red faces.
 
McAhuna said:
Very close to being proven as of 2026.

Latest technology all leading to the same conclusion - an unknown massive elongated biological entity
* DNA genetic analysis
* Acoustic Analysis
* Underwater camera sensors


At this point in 2026 sceptics and scoffers just need to find STFU and find somewhere to hide their red faces.
Click to expand...
He said a food rich environment. I always thought there isn't a lot of food in the loch which is one of the reasons for not believing in a monster.
 
Badger11 said:
He said a food rich environment. I always thought there isn't a lot of food in the loch which is one of the reasons for not believing in a monster.
Click to expand...

They used to think that. Now disproven.

It is now proven that there are carp over a metre long down there, and vast numbers of small eels.
 
My issue is not with the sustainable environment or even that (let's be clear) dinosaurs could have survived the catastrophic event that wiped out every other dinosaur 45 million years ago (or so). It is how there have been around 45,000 generations of them without, it appears, anyone being able to find them with the most sophisticated equipment. And it would have to be plural given the need for procreation.

Now, I am ruling nothing in and nothing out. As they say, we know more about distant stars than we do about what lurks beneath our waters. However, absent better cogent proof, I reserve the right to remain skeptical.
 
silvertop said:
My issue is not with the sustainable environment or even that (let's be clear) dinosaurs could have survived the catastrophic event that wiped out every other dinosaur 45 million years ago (or so). It is how there have been around 45,000 generations of them without, it appears, anyone being able to find them with the most sophisticated equipment. And it would have to be plural given the need for procreation.

Now, I am ruling nothing in and nothing out. As they say, we know more about distant stars than we do about what lurks beneath our waters. However, absent better cogent proof, I reserve the right to remain skeptical.
Click to expand...


I am getting a sense that no-one actually watched the video.

The latest technology proves categorically that whatever it is, it is not a dinosaur, reptile or plesiosaur.

But the latest technology does confirm that there is an large unknown creature down there. Most likely a very large, previously unidentified, eel type species.
 
McAhuna said:
I am getting a sense that no-one actually watched the video.

The latest technology proves categorically that whatever it is, it is not a dinosaur, reptile or plesiosaur.

But the latest technology does confirm that there is an large unknown creature down there.
Click to expand...
Saw maybe Expedition X that discussed huge Sturgeon. Maybe several meters long.
 
The absolute largest sturgeon on record—and the largest freshwater fish ever documented—is a female Beluga sturgeon (Huso huso) caught in the Volga Delta (Russia) in 1827. It measured a staggering 23 feet 7 inches (7.2 meters) in length and weighed 3,463 lbs (1,571 kg

Could be one of these
 
McAhuna said:
I am getting a sense that no-one actually watched the video.

The latest technology proves categorically that whatever it is, it is not a dinosaur, reptile or plesiosaur.

But the latest technology does confirm that there is an large unknown creature down there. Most likely a very large, previously unidentified, eel type species.
Click to expand...
Busted!

It's a big worm.

Somewhat anticlimactic.
 
McAhuna said:
I think the fact that there is a massive unknown creature down there is quite a result, whatever it is.

Mainstream normie scientific opinion previously dismissed it as a joke.
Click to expand...
By the by, I did not watch the video but the substance (you say) says defo not a dinosaur... but the image to bait the click suggests otherwise.
 
aliaster crowley lived in a big house right next to the loch ,and one night he was very busy carry in out his evil occult ways he summoned up the vile beastie and it has been in the loch ever since ,the most sighting are always close to his old house which was later brought by the guy from led zep er roger plant /page who is in to the dark arts, many people have seen it their 😈
 
Last edited:
blackgirl3 said:
aliaster crowley lived in a big house right next to the loch ,and one night he was very busy carry in out his evil occult ways he summoned up the vile beastie and it has been in the loch ever since ,the most sighting are always close to his old house which was later brought by the guy from led zep er roger plant /page who is in to the dark arts, many people have seen it 😈
Click to expand...
Now that I do believe!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top