silvertop
Member
- Location
- Portishead
- Country
England
Thanks. Edited.You forgot to mention antisemitic.
Thanks. Edited.You forgot to mention antisemitic.
Killing more terrorists and their support groups.What does that entail, do you think?
Far-right flag waver I expect.4 stabbed, 1 shot dead by police at a synagogue in Manchester, on Yom Kippur, car driven a pedestrians, breaking news. Source: bbc
Just been reading a post Reform put up on FB about this condoning it & of the reactions, 207(& counting) were the laughing emoji all with 'foreign' names. The amount of people posting were cheering it & they wern't 'foreign' names, disgusting how the left react, shouldn't be surprised really.Far-right flag waver I expect.
Israel will flatten Gaza city and Trump will relocate them elsewhere and build a golf course.What does that entail, do you think?
possibly true, the assailant was shot dead by Police.Far-right flag waver I expect.
Just been reading a post Reform put up on FB about this condoning it & of the reactions, 207(& counting) were the laughing emoji all with 'foreign' names. The amount of people posting were cheering it & they wern't 'foreign' names, disgusting how the left react, shouldn't be surprised really.
Hahaha!That's the left in a nutshell really. They champagne violence and try to rationalise it.
Perhaps it might be time to start a thread to discuss the dangerous left?
Fine. But what are your views on the tens of thousands who are not within those groups but end up collateral deaths, injuries and displaced?Killing more terrorists and their support groups.
Ha, funny. I'd be amazed if he wasn't a Muslim but I guess we'll soon find out.Far-right flag waver I expect.
Perhaps Mossad staged it to discredit our peace-loving Islamic community?Ha, funny. I'd be amazed if he wasn't a Muslim but I guess we'll soon find out.
That's war for you. Hamas now have an opportunity to end it, but of course they won't because they couldn't care less about the people they purport to represent. Similarly, apologists for their terrorism continue to try to undermine any peace moves.Fine. But what are your views on the tens of thousands who are not within those groups but end up collateral deaths, injuries and displaced?
It is becoming as amoral and disingenuous a defence as the standard and obvious "Jew hating" lie that Hamas bear sole responsibility for that. They are dropping no bombs from afar on Gazans.
Am I missing something?That's war for you. Hamas now have an opportunity to end it, but of course they won't because they couldn't care less about the people they purport to represent. Similarly, apologists for their terrorism continue to try to undermine any peace moves.
If one side is going to win, then that's about the size of it. Unconditional surrender for example. It wasn't moral - it was the inevitability of it.Am I missing something?
I thought peace missions/ceasefires were generally after negotiations between the warring parties. This seems to be: "These are the terms. If you don't accept them, then tough." End of...
Am I getting it wrong?
Yes, of course you, and all the other apologists, are getting it wrong.Am I missing something?
I thought peace missions/ceasefires were generally after negotiations between the warring parties. This seems to be: "These are the terms. If you don't accept them, then tough." End of...
Am I getting it wrong?