Ismaïla Sarr

The most interesting question right now is will Sarr give 100% and will he benefit from this system? I suspect the answer is 'yes' to both questions.

And while Sarr and his agent's tactics were abhorrent, he is one of our most vital players, particularly in a system which relies on swift progression. I have no problem with the money he gets in today's financial landscape.

I wouldn't mind betting he will be with us for at least another season. You don't up wages hugely on a player you intend selling in a few months. This isn't the Olise situation where we needed to pump up his release clause. We hold all the cards with Sarr and could reject offers for the next 3-4 windows without raising Sarr's wages ans still have a season to sell him. I suspect we are simply making Sarr happier to play and that he will knuckle down this season. We and the player will re-evaluate next summer and see if a £40M offer comes in, at which point we might have a successor lined up / bedded in and be willing to take that sort of fee.

Shame that a player who had become quite beloved here acted the way he did but that's the nature of the beast when it comes to modern football.
 
I must admit I'm not really sure on the rationale of offering him an improved contract.

He's on 75k and has the best part of 3 years left. That will take him to the summer after he's 31. He's kicked up an almighty stink and is clear he'd rather be off.

The argument that extending it would raise the fee we could get might be true if he was 23. But he's almost 29. Does a 29 year old with 2 years on a contract command far less than a 29 year old with 3 or 4 years on a contract? Wouldn't have thought so.

I guess the only way it makes sense is if it has a decent buy out. 40m?

Still dont like the thought of giving someone who's effectively been on strike a payrise

Because selling him and buying a ready made equivalent is far more expensive
 
The most interesting question right now is will Sarr give 100% and will he benefit from this system? I suspect the answer is 'yes' to both questions.

And while Sarr and his agent's tactics were abhorrent, he is one of our most vital players, particularly in a system which relies on swift progression. I have no problem with the money he gets in today's financial landscape.

I wouldn't mind betting he will be with us for at least another season. You don't up wages hugely on a player you intend selling in a few months. This isn't the Olise situation where we needed to pump up his release clause. We hold all the cards with Sarr and could reject offers for the next 3-4 windows without raising Sarr's wages ans still have a season to sell him. I suspect we are simply making Sarr happier to play and that he will knuckle down this season. We and the player will re-evaluate next summer and see if a £40M offer comes in, at which point we might have a successor lined up / bedded in and be willing to take that sort of fee.

Shame that a player who had become quite beloved here acted the way he did but that's the nature of the beast when it comes to modern football.
I know he is coming back from injury and didnt get many minutes on Sunday, but he didnt look very arsed to be there . Did he even get a touch .
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top