Immigration

HKOwen said:
Lammy has gone effectively. Not sure whose in tray this will land in.
Click to expand...

Good. The racist fat c***. He's the one putting forward that bill that allows the missus half your stuff if you love with them for 3 years as if you were married. Shocking proposal
 
Spindle said:
Good. The racist fat c***. He's the one putting forward that bill that allows the missus half your stuff if you love with them for 3 years as if you were married. Shocking proposal
Click to expand...
It's not needed. A couple not married can take out a civil partnership, if they haven't done that then tough.

Marriage is a public contract neither partner can claim later they didn't know this meant sharing their worldly good.

Living together without a civil partnership is impossible to define. What is living together? What if one person only stays 1 night per week? Is that living together? probably not. Okay 2 nights or 3 nights or 1 week per month etc.

The point is that marriage or a civil contact forces both partners to think about what they are getting into. If Lammy's bill becomes law expect to see cases where one party disputes that they were living together. Contract law is based on fairness to both sides but if one party has a different view of their personal circumstances then that is not fair.
 
Expect fewer relationships where they cohabit. more gold digging, partners being chucked out on the street after 2.8 years, and ultimately fewer babies.

And what of us later in life after divorce? I don't want my pot shared anymore, I'm not remarrying.

Feminism chucking out tradition except the bits the man supplies
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top