His Majesty's ambassador to the most powerful country ...

HKOwen said:
Is sacked as his infatuation / love of convicted pedo becomes public, the same one he brokered a deal with after the conviction.

What kind of pure incompetence would appoint such a slime bag to such an imporftant position.

" He was was properly vetted " says the imbecile who made the decision

JHFC
Click to expand...
Is that robust due diligence or just asking if there's anything that might come out?
 
chris123 said:
Is that robust due diligence or just asking if there's anything that might come out?
Click to expand...
Apparently an appointment like this goes to a robust vetting process. The media are saying that this process threw up his questionable relationship so that process does not seem at fault. If you are told someone is a wrong un and you ignore that who is to blame?
 
Badger11 said:
Apparently an appointment like this goes to a robust vetting process. The media are saying that this process threw up his questionable relationship so that process does not seem at fault. If you are told someone is a wrong un and you ignore that who is to blame?
Click to expand...
It's quite interesting as the vetting process like this gives people certain security level access. If the government has overridden the process to give security clearance to a high level, then further questions need to be asked. Surely the Ambassador to the US has access to high level material. This is worse than it appears.
 
Badger11 said:
As others have said what on earth was Starmer thinking? What qualities does he posses that made Starmer over look his obvious flaws? Does he have the negatives?

The Ambassador's role is really to be the messenger boy for his government so most senior civil servants could do the job. With communication technology I rather think the role has diminished from say pre war. After all why talk to the monkey when you can speak to the organ grinder.

Labour are trying to say the yanks loved him and he has been doing a great job on trade. I rather doubt that, the donkey work is done by Foreign Office staff. I can't see Mandy getting familiar with the minutia of UK versus US farming.

The new guy is a career civil servant, he's probably wondering why he didn't get the job in the first place.
Click to expand...
Good at fellatio, rimming, tea bagging? Or does it go a bit deeper? I mean pillow talk and a meaningful connection?
 
This business with Mandleson is beyond fishy. Why now? This idea the Epstein stuff has come as any great surprise is beyond belief. They would have KNOWN all of this existed before appointing him. I always believed it was the primary reason he was appointed in the first place.

For me this is about who actually had those emails 'leaked' to them. Bloomberg.

And if they have those emails, they have others.....

Possibly a threat? A kind of 'if we can do this to the British Ambassador to the US then imagine who else we can hurt?' Effectively a warning shot.

Proper 'House of Cards' s*** going on here.
 
Matov said:
This business with Mandleson is beyond fishy. Why now? This idea the Epstein stuff has come as any great surprise is beyond belief. They would have KNOWN all of this existed before appointing him. I always believed it was the primary reason he was appointed in the first place.

For me this is about who actually had those emails 'leaked' to them. Bloomberg.

And if they have those emails, they have others.....

Possibly a threat? A kind of 'if we can do this to the British Ambassador to the US then imagine who else we can hurt?' Effectively a warning shot.

Proper 'House of Cards' s*** going on here.
Click to expand...
East European male model rent boys with boxes of Swan Vestas kind of stuff? Who knows what certain people may have got up to behind closed doors.

The whole thing makes a mockery of the House of Lords as an upper chamber.

Somethings gotta change
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top