Glasner is the only the third manager in my near 60 years supporting the club who really allowed the fans to dream, to believe the flirtation with top was more than a quick fling; the other two managers being Venables and Coppell.
In each of the three cases the failure to push on was largely perceived to be based on the the failings of the ownership in selling key players and the failure to replace them adequately.
Venables is now largely judged as a spiv who reaped the benefits of Malcolm Allison’s work.
Coppell is still treated as a hero and is revered by the fans.
How will history treat Glasner?
I hop a little kinder than he’s being treated at present.