Flags.........& Politics.

[Rudi Hedman]

What do you care?

If you want to fly a flag symbolizing a Turkish saint, then fly it.

This comment says more about you than the people and your own country you’re trying to rubbish. If we did end up in civil war it would be good to know who takes this stance so we could turn the other way when they beg for help.

 

[silvertop]

St. Andrew and St. Patrick weren't Scottish or Irish but no one seems to have an issue with them.

No they weren't. The only one born here was St. David. The meaning has been lost over time. No-one now sees St. Patrick as Roman or St. Andrew as from Galilee.

The tongue was in cheek.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Err... yes, of course I'm aware.

We'd better watch out. Descendants of Africans. Mmm... It sounds like it might be an idea to send previous generations of Africans back, some would say: repatriation. Would you adhere to this view?

By the way, never been on BBS FYI.

Not condone but mitigate...mmm.

Lastly. Hey Penge, there's that 'liberal', again. So many instances of my point since you tried to dismiss it with your accusation that I was drunk and spouting rubbish.

Again, it's irritating having to repeat myself to leftists.....whose politics brought these problems to these shores.

To answer your question....so please don't repeat the same boring question.....My personal position on who gets sent back is obviously related to the legality of them being here.

My position is against multiculturalism. If people don't have allegiance to this country they need to go. I even stated this in another thread. I'm against the people who hate me and what I love.....to reduce it down to genetics is bottom set analysis.

For example, I like Badenoch as a person (even though she's no political leader) and many others, the idea that the right are going to deport people purely on genetics is the usual low IQ fear mongering.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

No they weren't. The only one born here was St. David. The meaning has been lost over time. No-one now sees St. Patrick as Roman or St. Andrew as from Galilee.

The tongue was in cheek.

Fair enough. My head was up arse.

 

[Glazier#1]

Again, it's irritating having to repeat myself to leftists.....whose politics brought these problems to these shores.

To answer your question....so please don't repeat the same boring question.....My personal position on who gets sent back is obviously related to the legality of them being here.

My position is against multiculturalism. If people don't have allegiance to this country they need to go. I even stated this in another thread. I'm against the people who hate me and what I love.....to reduce it down to genetics is bottom set analysis.

For example, I like Badenoch as a person (even though she's no political leader) and many others, the idea that the right are going to deport people purely on genetics is the usual low IQ fear mongering.

I'd agree with your comment. It is a low-IQ posture but there are an increasing number who would are now brave enough to admit to the support of deporting, expelling people, regardless of the legality of them being here.

Am I wrong?

 

[Stirlingsays]

I'd agree with your comment. It is a low-IQ posture but there are an increasing number who would are now brave enough to admit to the support of deporting, expelling people, regardless of the legality of them being here.

Am I wrong?

What I think you are probably getting mixed up with is that you seem to be against the belief that Europe and its countries have the right to remain majority European......to be well... Europe.

Obviously that filters down to each European country.

It is not about throwing out well adjusted people with a history in this country who aren't genetically European. The point is nonsense as non whites are on the right themselves.

This self protecting attitude will be found in pretty much every single African and Asian country and I get rather tired of Europe being singled out with these double standards.

I know why it happens of course because the politics of the left and liberals is of globalisation and universalism that's against national homes for Europeans.....Even though they may defend non European countries having the same attitudes of self rule.

It's about coming here and stealing resources and thus the futures of the British already here.

 

[silvertop]

Fair enough. My head was up arse.

My tongue is supposed to be at least near my cheek.

You still doing them lower back workouts?

 

[Teddy Eagle]

My tongue is supposed to be at least near my cheek.

You still doing them lower back workouts?

If I could get that far I'd never leave the house.

 

[Stirlingsays]

All those who sit out this issue need to understand that if they stay sat on that fence then eventually it'll be them as oldies or their children who will be forced to pay reparations based upon leftist narratives of the past and will have their resources taken from them.....it's inevitable with leftist demographic shift.

Indeed, as you already see with Khan in London, anything that reminds the ruling coalitions of the country's Anglo/White past will be taken down or renamed and it'll be called progress. Again, it'll quicken the more those ruling look upon London's landmarks as 'racist' or 'not representing them'.

When people were raising fears about what London would be become thirty years ago. They were ridiculed and called names.

They were proven correct and all those that called them names face zero accountability.

As one of their number once said, 'we're winning lads'.

Now London and some cities are strangers to the rest of England......Indeed, London is full of people who sneer at the idea of London as an English city.

 

[Stirlingsays]

British nationalist, Steve Laws has been arrested and is under investigation for a tweet.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

All those who sit out this issue need to understand that if they stay sat on that fence then eventually it'll be them as oldies or their children who will be forced to pay reparations based upon leftist narratives of the past and will have their resources taken from them.....it's inevitable with leftist demographic shift.

Indeed, as you already see with Khan in London, anything that reminds the ruling coalitions of the country's Anglo/White past will be taken down or renamed and it'll be called progress. Again, it'll quicken the more those ruling look upon London's landmarks as 'racist' or 'not representing them'.

When people were raising fears about what London would be become thirty years ago. They were ridiculed and called names.

They were proven correct and all those that called them names face zero accountability.

As one of their number once said, 'we're winning lads'.

Now London and some cities are strangers to the rest of England......Indeed, London is full of people who sneer at the idea of London as an English city.

Ash Sarkar said that. ‘Luxury communist’ she describes herself as. Couldn’t ride a bike a few years ago.

 

[Glazier#1]

All those who sit out this issue need to understand that if they stay sat on that fence then eventually it'll be them as oldies or their children who will be forced to pay reparations based upon leftist narratives of the past and will have their resources taken from them.....it's inevitable with leftist demographic shift.

Indeed, as you already see with Khan in London, anything that reminds the ruling coalitions of the country's Anglo/White past will be taken down or renamed and it'll be called progress. Again, it'll quicken the more those ruling look upon London's landmarks as 'racist' or 'not representing them'.

When people were raising fears about what London would be become thirty years ago. They were ridiculed and called names.

They were proven correct and all those that called them names face zero accountability.

As one of their number once said, 'we're winning lads'.

Now London and some cities are strangers to the rest of England......Indeed, London is full of people who sneer at the idea of London as an English city.

So, what intrigues me is that, for you, London (for example) and many other cities have already reached a point where it won't change. What is your proposal for the future, since, for you, it's too late?

 

[PalazioVecchio]

St. Andrew and St. Patrick weren't Scottish or Irish but no one seems to have an issue with them.

You clearly never watch RTE. They seem to love the renaissance of St Brigid....reborn as a) a feminist icon and b) a pagan Druid goddess type.
And the Patrick bloke is barely tolerated through gritted teeth. Probably cos his name sounds a bit like 'Patriarchy' and he is a bit Old School in his Christianity - male pale and stale. The St Patricks day Parade has been hijacked at least as much as the Eurovision Song Contest. Barely scant references to the beardy bloke himself and all that he represented. But a ton of dancing-smiling-fellas that would have defo earned the opprobrium of The Vatican.
Another reason The Elites want to forget St Patrick ? he was part of the large-scale European White Slavery...... a story they conveniently would rather forget about in towns like Bristol where they throw statues into the harbour.

Brigid - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Flags. The St George.....revived and popular with 50% of England, hated by the other half.
The St Patrick Flag.....barely even remembered. Ironic, since its a part of the Union Jack that Sinn Fein so despise. And is hidden within the Flag that Unionists wave so proudly to celebrate (Dutch/English/Scottish types) winning a battle, over the irish, 335 years ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/1jvs5y2/history_of_the_saint_patricks_cross

 

[Stirlingsays]

So, what intrigues me is that, for you, London (for example) and many other cities have already reached a point where it won't change. What is your proposal for the future, since, for you, it's too late?

Well, I have an idea but as I've written it many times before I can't be bothered to again.

If the topic of the future for London interests you then write your own predictions on here.

I'm sure we would love to hear your perspective.

 

[georgenorman]

So, what intrigues me is that, for you, London (for example) and many other cities have already reached a point where it won't change. What is your proposal for the future, since, for you, it's too late?

Move out of course.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

So, what intrigues me is that, for you, London (for example) and many other cities have already reached a point where it won't change. What is your proposal for the future, since, for you, it's too late?

Stop the increase. Slow it, anything. Stop the spread of the negatives of immigration out of the cities. Islamisation being a big one.

In London there are loads of pleasant roads tucked away, with white Europeans nicely tucked away too, but go onto most high streets and you’ll wonder what country or continent you’re in or maybe why you’re there.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Perhaps Glazier was too lazier to write up his own predictions?

 

[Stirlingsays]

David Starkey hits the nail on the head on why Starmer's and the left in general's attempts to rewire the nation's view of their national flags into their own personal DEI politics just doesn't work.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

as a kid, i would have cycled past many Public Buildings and barely noticed the flags flying proudly. Today, its become something we do not take for granted.

Pride and Ukraine flags now banned at council base after controversial decision

Warwickshire County Council will now routinely fly just three flags as contentious Reform UK policy narrowly approved

www.birminghammail.co.uk

 

[steeleye20]

'The phrase "flag waving nonce" is a derogatory term, primarily combining British slang. It refers to individuals perceived as performing performative patriotism or nationalism'.

😎 😎 😎 😎