Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
I asked your favourite AI to summarise the difference between socialism and communism. There is a long, detailed explanation but the summary is:-
“• Socialism = “the state (or society) owns or heavily controls the economy to reduce inequality”; can coexist with democracy, markets, and some private property.
• Communism = “no state, no classes, no money, everything owned in common”; a theoretical end-goal that has never been fully achieved at scale.
In everyday political discourse, the words are often used loosely or interchangeably, especially in anti-left rhetoric, but academically and historically they describe distinct (though related) concepts.”
See why you are wrong?
And where you fit in?
Trust you to take a quip seriously.
Of course they aren't the same.
One is a muted stepping stone version of the other.
In the Communist Manifesto (1848), Marx and Engels describe socialism (or more accurately, what many later called "socialism") as a transitional phase or stepping stone on the road to full communism.
Blair leads directly to Owen Jones...and, a lot of middle class blow-hards thinking they have worthwhile things to say.....usually pushing progressivism publicly, whilst practicing tax avoidance privately.