Why do you have to make this about party politics.?A free un- whipped vote is due.Several notable Tories are against the bill,the ostrich head in sand approach that make the tories unvotable.I suppose some tory supporters will not like it as the terminally ill are"economically Inactive".
Totally onside with you. Too many on here want to reduce debate to the lowest common denominator. For the record, after much thought, I am in favour of it - with the right safeguards.Why do you have to make this about party politics.?
It is an emotive topic and MPs from all parties have differing opinions hence the free vote. Significant leaders in the Labour party are against the bill.
For the record I am in favour but I certainly understand why some MPs will vote against it.
It is being voted for in Parliament and many well known politicians have spoken out to the media about how they will vote,Truss,Boris and May are against the bill.Why do you have to make this about party politics.?
It is an emotive topic and MPs from all parties have differing opinions hence the free vote. Significant leaders in the Labour party are against the bill.
For the record I am in favour but I certainly understand why some MPs will vote against it.
And they vote Tory.A free un- whipped vote is due.Several notable Tories are against the bill,the ostrich head in sand approach that make the tories unvotable.I suppose some tory supporters will not like it as the terminally ill are"economically Inactive".
OK, jokes aside. I can raise a strong argument for each side and either argument would convince me.Why do you have to make this about party politics.?
It is an emotive topic and MPs from all parties have differing opinions hence the free vote. Significant leaders in the Labour party are against the bill.
For the record I am in favour but I certainly understand why some MPs will vote against it.
Indeed, when an animal is put out of misery, it is termed "doing the humane thing".It's such an emotive subject that it is surely beyond mere party politics. Whilst accepting the sanctity of life argument it seems out of kilter that a vet can make a decision based on the prognosis and likely quality of life of an animal but a doctor can't.
And so is the Labour Health Secretary.It is being voted for in Parliament and many well known politicians have spoken out to the media about how they will vote,Truss,Boris and May are against the bill.
True. Politics is not a dirty word, my son's school campaigned to have a zebra crossing near the school,that was a political decision.And so is the Labour Health Secretary.
...exactly what happened in Ireland with abortion. It was promised to be very selective, only happening in very difficult circumstances.I think the fears are that this is a slippery slope as I've seen this several times in my life, they introduce something, tell you that it's nothing radical and then later on use the changed situation to push further.
So while what is suggested seems sensible I don't trust them as the saying about giving an inch is true....it's never respected.
Yep, no judgement on where anyone falls on this subject but for myself.....I don't trust the feckers.i bet that 'assisted dying' would predominantly hit the poor. No toffs, politicians , or Royalty for the chop. It reminds me of Lefty Education Ministers who send their own kids to private schools.