Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

[Lanzo-Ad]

Andrew was a ponce, a drain on the Sovereign grant, an embarrassment, workshy arsehole, rude, arrogant, abusive, a C*** of the highest order, and that is without the Epstein saga, lost all of his privileges, except obviously his role as Grandmaster of the Grand Lodge of England where he will probably get a standing ovation.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

can Andrew go and live with this lovely couple ?

Bill and Hillary Clinton delay depositions in House Oversight panel’s Jeffrey Epstein probe

A House Oversight Committee spokesperson told The Post Monday that the panel is “having conversations with the Clintons’ attorney to accommodate their schedules.”

nypost.com

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Andrew was a ponce, a drain on the Sovereign grant, an embarrassment, workshy arsehole, rude, arrogant, abusive, a C*** of the highest order, and that is without the Epstein saga, lost all of his privileges, except obviously his role as Grandmaster of the Grand Lodge of England where he will probably get a standing ovation.

As references go that needs a bit of a BBC edit.

 

[beak]

As references go that needs a bit of a BBC edit.

He won't apply for a job just yet.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

He won't apply for a job just yet.

He's OK. The DWP won't have caught up with his name change yet so he can sign on with that.

 

[beak]

He's OK. The DWP won't have caught up with his name change yet so he can sign on with that.

D im W itted P eople?

 

[Teddy Eagle]

D im W itted P eople?

Dole Wasted on P iss ups.

 

[Forest Hillbilly]

He's OK. The DWP won't have caught up with his name change yet so he can sign on with that.

I thought he didn't have a permanent address. All correspondence sent c/o Buckingham Palace. 😁

 

[Teddy Eagle]

I thought he didn't have a permanent address. All correspondence sent c/o Buckingham Palace. 😁

If it keeps unravelling for him his permanent address will have a door with a number, a peep hole and a large lock on it.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

The reason you won't read about it is possibly because it isn't true outside the fevered imagination of conspiracy theorists.

This is the AI overview.

Melania Trump has no confirmed involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, and there is no evidence that she was introduced to her husband by Epstein, as some have claimed.
Here are the key points regarding her connection to Jeffrey Epstein:

• Photographed Together: Melania and Donald Trump were photographed with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the Mar-a-Lago estate in February 2000.
• No Further Involvement: Beyond the appearance in this photograph at a social event, there is no evidence, testimony, or documentation suggesting Melania Trump had any substantive relationship with Epstein or was involved in his criminal activities.

Michael Wolff claims otherwise via information he gained via personal interviews with the people involved. To gather the admissible evidence via the discovery process is why the subpoenas will be issued.

The reason it won’t appear in the MSM yet is obviously because they don’t want to risk also being hit by a defamation indictment. They are reporting the Melania v Wolff one and the counter claim.

AI will report only what’s public. Try asking about the Wolff v Trump case!

If you think Michael Wolff is merely a conspiracy theorist with a fevered imagination then you will dismiss this. I don’t. I think he is a well connected serious journalist with genuine concerns over American democracy.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Michael Wolff claims otherwise via information he gained via personal interviews with the people involved. To gather the admissible evidence via the discovery process is why the subpoenas will be issued.

The reason it won’t appear in the MSM yet is obviously because they don’t want to risk also being hit by a defamation indictment. They are reporting the Melania v Wolff one and the counter claim.

AI will report only what’s public. Try asking about the Wolff v Trump case!

If you think Michael Wolff is merely a conspiracy theorist with a fevered imagination then you will dismiss this. I don’t. I think he is a well connected serious journalist with genuine concerns over American democracy.

AI doesn't agree with this glowing testimony but as per the BBC journalistic accuracy doesn't matter.

"In summary, Wolff is a skilled writer who gains extraordinary access and produces compelling narratives, but his work is generally viewed as less reliable on specific, verifiable facts and requires caution and independent confirmation of its claims".

 

[PalazioVecchio]

If it keeps unravelling for him his permanent address will have a door with a number, a peep hole and a large lock on it.

maybe, but its still better than the basement where the Soviets accommodated their Royal family.

Its tough being Royal. One moment you are eating cream cake on the lawn, the next you're at Fotheringhay Castle trying to guess which wig will look best in the executioners bucket.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

maybe, but its still better than the basement where the Soviets accommodated their Royal family.

Its tough being Royal. One moment you are eating cream cake on the lawn, the next you're at Fotheringhay Castle trying to guess which wig will look best in the executioners bucket.

But at least the basement was unlikely to contain an angry gentleman called Bigga who's more than keen to move a social relationship up by several levels.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

AI doesn't agree with this glowing testimony but as per the BBC journalistic accuracy doesn't matter.

"In summary, Wolff is a skilled writer who gains extraordinary access and produces compelling narratives, but his work is generally viewed as less reliable on specific, verifiable facts and requires caution and independent confirmation of its claims".

Of course any claims need to be verified. However, as the above says, his are compelling, especially as they chime with others made by equally reliable sources. Sources who aren’t political opponents but people who have worked for, or closely observed, Trump.

There is a growing, and heavy, amount of circumstantial evidence that surrounds Trump alongside the clearly corrupt behaviour he is now indulging in plain view.

A lot now depends on the Supreme Court. If the conservative majority there bends the knee then anything is possible. If they defend the constitution then they can save the Union.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Of course any claims need to be verified. However, as the above says, his are compelling, especially as they chime with others made by equally reliable sources. Sources who aren’t political opponents but people who have worked for, or closely observed, Trump.

There is a growing, and heavy, amount of circumstantial evidence that surrounds Trump alongside the clearly corrupt behaviour he is now indulging in plain view.

A lot now depends on the Supreme Court. If the conservative majority there bends the knee then anything is possible. If they defend the constitution then they can save the Union.

That's the way. Just ignore 66% of what it said. BBC editing par excellence.

 

[cryrst]

Of course any claims need to be verified. However, as the above says, his are compelling, especially as they chime with others made by equally reliable sources. Sources who aren’t political opponents but people who have worked for, or closely observed, Trump.

There is a growing, and heavy, amount of circumstantial evidence that surrounds Trump alongside the clearly corrupt behaviour he is now indulging in plain view.

A lot now depends on the Supreme Court. If the conservative majority there bends the knee then anything is possible. If they defend the constitution then they can save the Union.

Save the union. WTF does that even mean to you considering your lack of compassion for your own country and its citizens. You have constantly defended wrong uns and continue to do so. From involving little girls, a system allowing the UKs death from a million immigrants to a national tax taking broadcaster trying to brainwash the public. To name but 3.
You are comedy gold.🤦🤦🤦