Woke is alive and well

[PalazioVecchio]

higher housing and rent costs mean that households NEED two incomes to be able to get on so it actively pushes women into work.

rubbish. Kids need tons of contact-time with their parents. Both parents.

The statistics & outcomes for latchkey kids are poor. Life expectancy, criminality, education etc. And for unemployed longterm dole-heads, even worse.

 

[Stirlingsays]

A rudimentary AI output suggests exactly what I expected:

Research Findings:

• Some studies have found a positive correlation between female labor force participation and house prices, but this doesn't necessarily prove causation according to IZA - Institute of Labor Economics.
  
  
• Other research indicates that the relationship might be complex and influenced by various factors, including geographic location, housing supply, and other economic conditions.
  
  
• It's also important to note that other factors, such as interest rates, construction costs, and overall economic growth, also play a significant role in housing prices.

In conclusion:
While it's plausible that women entering the workforce contributes to increased housing demand and potentially higher prices, the relationship is likely more nuanced and interconnected with other economic factors. It's not a simple case of one directly causing the other.

Yeah, I wonder how many feminists both male and female decided on that response.

Of course there are other factors but the idea that more independent woman who aren't married working full time doesn't translate into requiring more housing......Well, it seems like denial just for the sake of 'obvious realities I don't like admitting to'.

 

[Common Sense Club]

A huge property crash would result from millions of mortgage defaults in larger properties needing 2 wages. Younger people would be able to get on the property ladder earlier if they are still in their job taxed at 100% living with their parents. That is if landlords and speculators haven’t got in before and scooped up too many properties to make this impossible yet again.

So let’s take it back to when my parents were young and attitudes were totally different.
Firstly, when my parents married my mother had to give up work as it was expected that she would have children and would be concentrating on their wellbeing
Secondly, they managed on one salary (I am not sure if you could get two salary mortgages then). Sure, we didn’t go on foreign holidays nor have a car but we were happy. My father was out of work for about 6 months but we seemed to cope.
Thirdly, my uncle had to marry his lady friend in order to take a foreign holiday; maybe she was expected to travel on his passport, but the holiday company would not accept a ‘two singles’ booking.
The introduction of the pill meant a woman had a right to choose and this spread to her right whether to work or not. More money in the system means more ways to spend it and with that came house inflation. So, for people like Dan (whom I have every sympathy for on this topic), would his family be better off in the 50s/60s, and would he be prepared to give up the freedoms we now have to have the same lifestyle as then?

 

[PalazioVecchio]

A rudimentary AI output suggests exactly what I expected:

Research Findings:

• Some studies have found a positive correlation between female labor force participation and house prices, but this doesn't necessarily prove causation according to IZA - Institute of Labor Economics.
  
  
• Other research indicates that the relationship might be complex and influenced by various factors, including geographic location, housing supply, and other economic conditions.
  
  
• It's also important to note that other factors, such as interest rates, construction costs, and overall economic growth, also play a significant role in housing prices.

In conclusion:
While it's plausible that women entering the workforce contributes to increased housing demand and potentially higher prices, the relationship is likely more nuanced and interconnected with other economic factors. It's not a simple case of one directly causing the other.

Dan you are quoting a left-wing think tank. Funded by Climate nutters. You need to try harder.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

A rudimentary AI output suggests exactly what I expected:

Research Findings:

• Some studies have found a positive correlation between female labor force participation and house prices, but this doesn't necessarily prove causation according to IZA - Institute of Labor Economics.
  
  
• Other research indicates that the relationship might be complex and influenced by various factors, including geographic location, housing supply, and other economic conditions.
  
  
• It's also important to note that other factors, such as interest rates, construction costs, and overall economic growth, also play a significant role in housing prices.

In conclusion:
While it's plausible that women entering the workforce contributes to increased housing demand and potentially higher prices, the relationship is likely more nuanced and interconnected with other economic factors. It's not a simple case of one directly causing the other.

‘While it’s plausible’ is the creator’s way of admitting it without actually saying so. Of course it isn’t the only reason but it is a big reason.

By the way, the creator’s 2nd bullet point have always been factors in house prices so hardly worth mentioning, apart from trying to dilute and divert eyes away from relevant new factors of the time in question.

• It's also important to note that other factors, such as interest rates, construction costs, and overall economic growth, also play a significant role in housing prices.

 

[DanH]

Yeah, I wonder how many feminists both male and female decided on that response.

Of course there are other factors but the idea that more independent woman who aren't married working full time doesn't translate into requiring more housing......Well, it seems like denial just for the sake of 'obvious realities I don't like admitting to'.

The Google AI is a feminist now?

 

[DanH]

‘While it’s plausible’ is the creator’s way of admitting it without actually saying so. Of course it isn’t the only reason but it is a big reason.

By the way, the creator’s 2nd bullet point have always been factors in house prices so hardly worth mentioning, apart from trying to dilute and divert eyes away from relevant new factors of the time in question.

• It's also important to note that other factors, such as interest rates, construction costs, and overall economic growth, also play a significant role in housing prices.

The ‘creator’ is Google AI which pulls together a summary based on everything it can find on in the internet. Its summary seems a highly logical conclusion given how many factors influence property prices, but sure, let’s all blame those pesky wimmin having a job on why houses cost so much.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

The ‘creator’ is Google AI which pulls together a summary based on everything it can find on in the internet. Its summary seems a highly logical conclusion given how many factors influence property prices, but sure, let’s all blame those pesky wimmin having a job on why houses cost so much.

I’ve said several times it’s an observation and I don’t blame women.

 

[Stirlingsays]

The Google AI is a feminist now?

Dear o' dear Dan, have a coffee or something.

I was referring to the Institute of Labor Economics who you directly referenced.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

So let’s take it back to when my parents were young and attitudes were totally different.
Firstly, when my parents married my mother had to give up work as it was expected that she would have children and would be concentrating on their wellbeing
Secondly, they managed on one salary (I am not sure if you could get two salary mortgages then). Sure, we didn’t go on foreign holidays nor have a car but we were happy. My father was out of work for about 6 months but we seemed to cope.
Thirdly, my uncle had to marry his lady friend in order to take a foreign holiday; maybe she was expected to travel on his passport, but the holiday company would not accept a ‘two singles’ booking.
The introduction of the pill meant a woman had a right to choose and this spread to her right whether to work or not. More money in the system means more ways to spend it and with that came house inflation. So, for people like Dan (whom I have every sympathy for on this topic), would his family be better off in the 50s/60s, and would he be prepared to give up the freedoms we now have to have the same lifestyle as then?

Neither would Basil Fawlty in the mid ‘70s. The wedding episode where Polly knows the family and Basil thinks the senior male is sh@gging his wife, the daughter and Polly, one after the other, all in one afternoon. Then a swinging session of all 4 😂

‘’Has it got a double bed?’’
‘’Has it got a breeze?’’

‘’What?’’

‘’Is it airy?’’

‘’Well it’s got air in it’’

 

[DanH]

Dear o' dear Dan, have a coffee or something.

I was referring to the Institute of Labor Economics who you directly referenced.

So convenient when you can just dismiss an academic with a label and completely disregard it immediately in your own head isn’t it.

So intellectually dishonest.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

So convenient when you can just dismiss an academic with a label and completely disregard it immediately in your own head isn’t it.

That's what left wing academics do. All the time. 'Intellectually dishonest' to you too Dan.

Just like the feminist academics who seek evidence of women being an underclass , deserving of a legal and financial help-up. These academics decide their answers BEFORE they conduct their research. You may as well try to win an argument with a beardy loon at Hyde Park corner.

Feminism is hate-speech. They dont like it much when you turn their own Orwellian language back at them. But true. Feminists hate 50% of the Worlds population. They are mostly mentally ill and in medieval times would have been committed to living in a Convent/Nunnery.

Feminists. Focussing on victimhood and the Patriarchy. I always imagine a female professor at Harvard/Yale/Princeton who lives in a mansion and gets Carlos, the nice mexican gardener, to prune her rose-bushes. It saves her the time of doing the gardening herself so that she can focus on writing articles about how the concept of the male as the 'head of household' is an anachronism ( her words). She is single & has twins via IVF from a Sperm bank. Carlos's wife & kids love him but think he works too hard.

The quote below is from the Feminist stunner 'Andrea Dworkin' an intellectual giant, giantess, giant-i-they, in a World of intellectual pygmies.

“Many women, I think, resist feminism because it is an agony to be fully conscious of the brutal misogyny which permeates culture, society, and all personal relationships.” Andrea Dworkin

Wrestler Giant Haystacks Stock Photo - Alamy

Download this stock image: Wrestler Giant Haystacks - 2D35GH9 from Alamy's library of millions of high resolution stock photos, illustrations and vectors.

www.alamy.com

 

[georgenorman]

The ‘creator’ is Google AI which pulls together a summary based on everything it can find on in the internet. Its summary seems a highly logical conclusion given how many factors influence property prices, but sure, let’s all blame those pesky wimmin having a job on why houses cost so much.

The Creator moves in mysterious ways.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

'Google' is about as politically-neutral as Gillette.

 

[DanH]

No wonder all the women posters bar one disappeared from here too.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

No wonder all the women posters bar one disappeared from here too.

What are you saying? Men shouldn’t be themselves or hold their own views to attract and keep more female members on a football forum?

Is that what everyone should do everywhere? And who decides what is an acceptable opinion?

Go along to keep ‘em on.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

This reminds me of a female member who went on a swearing rant sl&gging off the manager like you wouldn’t believe after an embarrassing performance at Brighton one Sunday.

 

[Stirlingsays]

So convenient when you can just dismiss an academic with a label and completely disregard it immediately in your own head isn’t it.

So intellectually dishonest.

I dismiss anything that doesn't make sense.

I'm not dishonest.

 

[DanH]

rubbish. Kids need tons of contact-time with their parents. Both parents.

The statistics & outcomes for latchkey kids are poor. Life expectancy, criminality, education etc. And for unemployed longterm dole-heads, even worse.

So how are parents meant to earn enough to pay for everything and both give ‘tons of contact-time’?

Are you a parent yourself, eagle?

 

[DanH]

I dismiss anything that doesn't make sense.

I'm not dishonest.

There’s literally tonnes of stuff out there that suggest what you believe is at best, very flimsy, but you crack on.