Ballymena

[georgenorman]

Where are all yours?

I listed them in #55

 

[DanH]

I listed them in #55

Wow, you have a very different definition to me then. Reads to me as sympathy for the violent protests, not the victim.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

So all you on the right really care about the victim do you? Similar to Southport and the grooming gangs, you use it as a tool to justify your bête noire of immigration.

If you really cared about rape victims on the right you wouldn't be rallying around people like Trump, the Tate brothers, Conor McGregor, Russell Brand ad infinitum.

was somebody captured on cctv snogging a fella in the foyer of an Hotel, AFTER, an alleged crime happened ? and then the cctv deemed inadmissable as evidence ?
Dan, at the risk of sounding like a conspiracy nut, isnt it curious how EVERY fella on the right seems to have a ton of sex crimes in his wake ? a bit like many millionaire top sportsmen , its curious don't you think ? and the only defence they have is to declare that it was all consensual ?

call me paranoid, but if Gary Lineker suddenly swung to the right, would we see a cavalcade of his 'victims' being paraded in front of the media ?

 

[PalazioVecchio]

Wow, you have a very different definition to me then. Reads to me as sympathy for the violent protests, not the victim.

"reads to me as" = i am putting my words into your keyboard, again.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Apparently the right are required to issue statements about riots in America or you're a hypocrite.

While the left do double standards all the time apparently they expect you to behave better.

Bite me.

 

[DanH]

was somebody captured on cctv snogging a fella in the foyer of an Hotel, AFTER, an alleged crime happened ? and then the cctv deemed inadmissable as evidence ?
Dan, at the risk of sounding like a conspiracy nut, isnt it curious how EVERY fella on the right seems to have a ton of sex crimes in his wake ? a bit like many millionaire top sportsmen , its curious don't you think ? and the only defence they have is to declare that it was all consensual ?

call me paranoid, but if Gary Lineker suddenly swung to the right, would we see a cavalcade of his 'victims' being paraded in front of the media ?

"A jury found McGregor liable for assault after a woman accused him of raping her in a Dublin hotel in December 2018. He has been ordered to pay Hand more than €248,000 in damages and is also responsible for her legal costs"

Where is your sympathy for his victim?

 

[CPFCSaturn]

EVERY fella on the right seems to have a ton of sex crimes in his wake

You said it 🙂

 

[CPFCSaturn]

Apparently the right are required to issue statements about riots in America or you're a hypocrite.

While the left do double standards all the time apparently they expect you to behave better.

Bite me.

You've literally just said:

"When the BLM riots happened here you heard not a squeak from them(the left)"

So are people required to issue statements or not..?

 

[Stirlingsays]

You said it 🙂

A Karen, will be round later to give you a merit badge.

 

[DanH]

You said it 🙂

You don't have to be a sex criminal to be right wing, but it helps 🙂

 

[Stirlingsays]

You've literally just said:

"When the BLM riots happened here you heard not a squeak from them(the left)"

So are people required to issue statements or not..?

No, that's the point....didn't I explain this to you the other day?

He expects egalitarianism and equality from the right, when the right aren't strong believers in either.

Yet the left claim to be both those things.....So the hypocrisy is that while they expect the right to live up to these standards they don't live up up to them themselves....and only have excuses for why they fail them.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

"A jury found McGregor liable for assault after a woman accused him of raping her in a Dublin hotel in December 2018. He has been ordered to pay Hand more than €248,000 in damages and is also responsible for her legal costs"

Where is your sympathy for his victim?

the case was examined for a Criminal Court and deemed not fit to meet the evidence threshold.

she did him in a Civil case. His word against hers. With rumours of them having been seen snogging seemingly both before and after the 'crime' - in the hotel lobby. All of them on drink & Cocaine on a tuesday evening. Her having left her kid with a babysitter and told her partner she was otherwise occupied.

the Mike Tyson rape conviction was a woman who had followed him to his hotel bedroom and walked into the bedroom while he was lying in his underpants watching TV. Tyson said it was all consensual.

RAPE VICTIM SAYS SHE DIDN'T INTEND TO RUIN TYSON

How much money did Desiree Washington make from the Mike Tyson trial?

Answer (1 of 3): Desiree Washington made $3 million from the Mike Tyson trial. She used a large portion of this money to start her own business, and the rest she invested in stocks and real estate. Desiree has been quoted as saying that the experience was "traumatic" but it was worth it because...

www.quora.com

Tiger Woods, Messi/Ronaldo, Donald Trump.......... you get rich & famous and i would recommend either a very monogamous marriage or a vow of chastity. Who was that american Vice-President who refused to have meetings with any women without a third party as a witness ? was it Mike Pence ? wise man.

Not exactly the same as the violent brutal gang rape of children by the Pakistani gang in the link below.

Rochdale gang found guilty of sexually exploiting girls

Police watchdog supervises inquiry into case after chance was missed to investigate two abusers four years ago

www.theguardian.com

i am reluctant to comment on any sex crimes in Ballymena cos the case may be ongoing. But it doesnt really sound good to me ?

 

[Stirlingsays]

the case was examined for a Criminal Court and deemed not fit to meet the evidence threshold.

she did him in a Civil case. His word against hers. With rumours of them having been seen snogging seemingly both before and after the 'crime'. All of them on drink & Cocaine. Her having left her kid with a babysitter and told her partner she was otherwise occupied.
Not exactly the same as the violent brutal gang rape of children by a Pakistani gang in the link below.

Rochdale gang found guilty of sexually exploiting girls

Police watchdog supervises inquiry into case after chance was missed to investigate two abusers four years ago

www.theguardian.com

Yep, seemed like the usual establishment 'conviction' to me.....dodgy.

 

[eaglesdare]

the case was examined for a Criminal Court and deemed not fit to meet the evidence threshold.

she did him in a Civil case. His word against hers. With rumours of them having been seen snogging seemingly both before and after the 'crime'. All of them on drink & Cocaine. Her having left her kid with a babysitter and told her partner she was otherwise occupied.
Not exactly the same as the violent brutal gang rape of children by a Pakistani gang in the link below.

Rochdale gang found guilty of sexually exploiting girls

Police watchdog supervises inquiry into case after chance was missed to investigate two abusers four years ago

www.theguardian.com

It was also strategic that it was just before an election. He was needed to be out of the picture.

 

[georgenorman]

Wow, you have a very different definition to me then. Reads to me as sympathy for the violent protests, not the victim.

The Left tries to take control of language and change the meaning of words - often to their complete opposite, Orwell predicted it with Newspeak.

So what was posted expresses sympathy for violent protests.

“Irish women and girls cannot walk safely is heartbreaking”
“Ulster Scots protecting their women folk”
“tainted by Grooming gangs & other casual attitudes to sexual violence”
“shouldn't take away from the fact that a girl was sexually assaulted and the two suspects are in court being charged with rape”
“Maybe the poor girls in question should just close their eyes and think of Imperialism”

 

[CPFCSaturn]

No, that's the point....didn't I explain this to you the other day?

He expects egalitarianism and equality from the right, when the right aren't strong believers in either.

Yet the left claim to be both those things.....So the hypocrisy is that while they expect the right to live up to these standards they don't live up up to them themselves....and only have excuses for why they fail them.

No, it's just expecting consistent standards - don't at all agree it's a left/right issue or anything to do with egalitarianism or equality; it's about your own standards as an individual.

You're essentially saying the right can be as hypocritical as they want because they don't believe in equality - I think that's a poor argument.

 

[eaglesdare]

There was a peaceful protest not far from me last night where an IPAS center going right beside a primary school.

300 undocumented males loitering right beside a primary school.

The country is turning into a tinder pot ready to explode.

Unfortunately he will most likely be sacked by Monday morning the teacher.

 

[Stirlingsays]

No, it's just expecting consistent standards - don't at all agree it's a left/right issue or anything to do with egalitarianism or equality; it's about your own standards as an individual.

You're essentially saying the right can be as hypocritical as they want because they don't believe in equality - I think that's a poor argument.

I don't, because it's true.

You thinking that egalitarianism/equality is about 'standards' is just evidence that you are intrinsically left wing.

The right believe in fairness, not equality and egalitarianism is just universalism and thus a gateway for neo communism.

 

[CPFCSaturn]

I don't, because it's true.

You thinking that egalitarianism/equality is about 'standards' is just evidence that you are intrinsically left wing.

The right believe in fairness, not equality and egalitarianism is just universalism and thus a gateway for neo communism.

It's not a matter of fact - that's your opinion, fair enough, but it doesn't make it true.

I think 'standards' is about consistently applying the principles you uphold, not deciding your reaction based on who is involved.

I've genuinely never come across an argument that hypocrisy can be justified based on your political leaning - certainly an interesting take.

 

[HKOwen]

So all you on the right really care about the victim do you? Similar to Southport and the grooming gangs, you use it as a tool to justify your bête noire of immigration.

If you really cared about rape victims on the right you wouldn't be rallying around people like Trump, the Tate brothers, Conor McGregor, Russell Brand ad infinitum.

Have the names you quote been convicted of rape? Serious accusations if not as in libellous and put the site at risk for allowing them, try to think before you post this kind of nonsense

FYI assault and rape are different things, difficult concept for some