Do GB News or Spiked have a corrections and clarifications section?How very dare you 😀
I'd be interested to see it if you could direct me there. 🙂
Last edited:
Do GB News or Spiked have a corrections and clarifications section?How very dare you 😀
The same comment to Pride marchers would be defamatory.Haha. What you and your friends get up to in your private lives is your own business.
I thought that goes straight to Ofcom. Whereas the BBC quietly settle every case with your money.Do GB News or Spiked have a corrections and clarifications section?
I'd be interested to see it if you could direct me there. 🙂
No. Too evasive, mate. I'll ask again: do GB News and Spiked have a Corrections and Clarifications section of their own? Could you please direct me to it?I thought that goes straight to Ofcom. Whereas the BBC quietly settle every case with your money.
![]()
GB News wins Ofcom legal challenge over Jacob Rees-Mogg shows
The High Court says Ofcom's rulings over two shows hosted by Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg were unlawful.www.bbc.com
I expect it's in the same place as the rest of the media, tucked away in a corner. 😀No. Too evasive, mate. I'll ask again: do GB News and Spiked have a Corrections and Clarifications section of their own? Could you please direct me to it?
You're welcome to look it up. As they receive no public funding, I guess it's between them and who they are supposed to apologise to. Although, as said, GB news is always getting done by Ofcom until judges are forced to intervene. They apologised for Laurence Fox obviously.No. Too evasive, mate. I'll ask again: do GB News and Spiked have a Corrections and Clarifications section of their own? Could you please direct me to it?
You're welcome to look it up. As they receive no public funding, I guess it's between them and who they are supposed to apologise to. Although, as said, GB news is always getting done by Ofcom until judges are forced to intervene. They apologised for Laurence Fox obviously.
I don't watch it to be fair. I quite like the odd Spiked article but don't particularly seek it out. If someone posts a link, I'll read it. I find I often read the Guardian online as I like a laugh.
I'm too busy burning books and measuring craniums to subscribe - but it sounds interesting. I'll perhaps add it to my Boss catalogue collection. Cheers mate.I'd just assumed that we were all reading 'Jackboot Monthly' in preparation for our invasion of Poland.
Well, look it up I did. It was nowhere to be seen looking at the home page menu. I looked at all the pages and was on the site for 1/2 hour.You're welcome to look it up. As they receive no public funding, I guess it's between them and who they are supposed to apologise to. Although, as said, GB news is always getting done by Ofcom until judges are forced to intervene. They apologised for Laurence Fox obviously.
I don't watch it to be fair. I quite like the odd Spiked article but don't particularly seek it out. If someone posts a link, I'll read it. I find I often read the Guardian online as I like a laugh.
I presume you donated.Well, look it up I did. It was nowhere to be seen looking at the home page menu. I looked at all the pages and was on the site for 1/2 hour.
Tbf I looked on the BBC News website and couldn't find it there either.
Does Paolo Di Canio still do the match reports?I'd just assumed that we were all reading 'Jackboot Monthly' in preparation for our invasion of Poland.
Ha ha. This charade is hilarious, Lefty. Using hyperbolic humour to deviate. Not a bad strategy but a little overused, I feel.I'd just assumed that we were all reading 'Jackboot Monthly' in preparation for our invasion of Poland.
Haha. No, mate, not directly.I presume you donated.
They're still around.Ha ha. This charade is hilarious, Lefty. Using hyperbolic humour to deviate. Not a bad strategy but a little overused, I feel.
Jackboots? No, far too savvy for that kind of thing.
Taking a leaf out of Yaxley-Lennon's notebook, the right and those on the extreme arm of it have learnt that they need to appear fair and democratic in order to steer public opinion away from shadows of the old BNP and NF. Same old people, just new clothes. What ever happened to those organisations, by the way?
Ask Laura, she'll tell you, I'm sure: The extreme right know that these days you have to be media - wise.
Oh. Thanks. Never knew.
Having to pay for Koch, who knew?Haha. No, mate, not directly.
The whole world donates when the Koch brothers are calling the tune.
Julian Clary probably had a clue.Having to pay for Koch, who knew?
Ha ha. This charade is hilarious, Lefty. Using hyperbolic humour to deviate. Not a bad strategy but a little overused, I feel.
Jackboots? No, far too savvy for that kind of thing.
Taking a leaf out of Yaxley-Lennon's notebook, the right and those on the extreme arm of it have learnt that they need to appear fair and democratic in order to steer public opinion away from shadows of the old BNP and NF. Same old people, just new clothes. What ever happened to those organisations, by the way?
Ask Laura, she'll tell you, I'm sure: The extreme right know that these days you have to be media - wise.
Oh. Thanks. Never knew.
Wow! Self promotion: the royal 'we'.Why doesn't that surprise us.