This is very fair. And in comparison to the Glasner comparison, the big difference is that we aren’t seeing the green shoots.It was always going to be a transition period, and a difficult one to manage. I said at the time that we should have prioritised experienced campaigners to see us through, and begin the next phase of developing talent far more slowly and later on. A steady hand manager would have made far more sense in the circumstances.
Thing is, that doesn't mean it could only ever have gone as it did, or that the risks were not worth taking. If we were 15th right now, watching Dyche-ball every week, we would all be bemoaning the club's lack of ambition and failure to maintain positive momentum by appointing someone like that 'Sage' bloke who we were linked with!
If we’re prioritising pressing and keeping possession in training*, why are we still so bad at both? If we’re an attacking team, why do we create so few chances, even if the ones we do create are often very eye-catching?
It’s one thing to accept being shaky on set pieces while you’re working on the other bits, but the problem Sage has is that isn’t abundantly clear what they HAVE actually been working on. That’s not purely down to the quality of playing staff either.
*and acknowledging this is based on reports from elsewhere