Israel v Hamas

cryrst said:
What genocide as the population in Gaza is increasing. But fundamentally yes Israel can continue to hunt them down like the dogs they are. If people are so stupid and afraid you go and help them to understand they are meat for a Hamas grinder ! See how high you can bounce !
Click to expand...

We dealt with the whole ‘population increasing’ bullshit already - repeating a lie when you’ve been told it’s a lie is very poor form.

Ok, you support atrocities and the slaughter of civilians if the terrorists don’t surrender. I don’t.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
We dealt with the whole ‘population increasing’ bullshit already - repeating a lie when you’ve been told it’s a lie is very poor form.

Ok, you support atrocities and the slaughter of civilians if the terrorists don’t surrender. I don’t.
Click to expand...
So has the population increased by more than have died in three years. UNICEF say yes but you say no. Mmm that’s a hard one to work who’s using BS.
And if you think terrorists are good then ok to you ! It’s an opinion I don’t agree with but each to their own !
 
cryrst said:
So has the population increased by more than have died in three years. UNICEF say yes but you say no. Mmm that’s a hard one to work who’s using BS.
And if you think terrorists are good then ok to you ! It’s an opinion I don’t agree with but each to their own !
Click to expand...

It would also be interesting to see the stats on death by natural causes in gaza if they are published anywhere? 🤔
 
cryrst said:
So has the population increased by more than have died in three years. UNICEF say yes but you say no. Mmm that’s a hard one to work who’s using BS.
And if you think terrorists are good then ok to you ! It’s an opinion I don’t agree with but each to their own !
Click to expand...

Where do UNICEF say the population has increased?
 
CPFCSaturn said:
" A Centre for Media Monitoring analysis of more than 35,000 pieces of BBC coverage found that Israeli deaths received 33 times more coverage per fatality than Palestinian deaths, emotive language was used around four times more frequently for Israeli victims, and "murder" was used 220 times for Israeli victims compared with once for Palestinians. A separate academic analysis of a BBC report on the al-Shifa raid found that 3 minutes 17 seconds of a 6-minute report was devoted to Israeli officials, compared with only seven seconds to the Palestinian perspective. There are also repeated examples of passive formulations for Palestinian deaths, such as "air strike on Gaza school kills..." rather than explicitly identifying Israel as the actor. None of this proves deliberate pro-Israel intent, and there are certainly examples of BBC coverage that could be criticised as anti-Israel. But if we're discussing evidence rather than simply asserting that the BBC is biased, there is a substantial case that aspects of its coverage have systematically given greater prominence, humanisation and narrative authority to Israeli perspectives."
Click to expand...


Is this the same as saying that flying is the safest form of travel? (per mile not per trip)
Or that China is the richest country in the World (not per capita)
Or that white people commit the most sexual assaults (not per capita)

How thick do you think we are?
 
cryrst said:
this so roughly 60k per year which is nearly 2.5 x the Hamas reported deaths. Israel are pretty crap at genocide you think ?
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think the birth rate of the first 105 days after October 7th remains the same for the rest of the 3 years since..? Total nonsense.

ChatGPT:

In January 2024, UNICEF said that nearly 20,000 babies had been born during the first 105 days of the war — roughly 190 births per day.


In late 2025, however, UNICEF explicitly said there were “fewer births” than before the war. It compared 2022 with 2025 and reported:


  • 2022: about 250 low-birth-weight babies per month, representing 5% of births.
  • First half of 2025: about 300 low-birth-weight babies per month, but this represented 10% of all births, because the total number of births had fallen.
 
Spindle said:
Is this the same as saying that flying is the safest form of travel? (per mile not per trip)
Or that China is the richest country in the World (not per capita)
Or that white people commit the most sexual assaults (not per capita)

How thick do you think we are?
Click to expand...

No, and if you think that makes sense… incredibly.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
Do you seriously think the birth rate of the first 105 days after October 7th remains the same for the rest of the 3 years since..? Total nonsense.

ChatGPT:

In January 2024, UNICEF said that nearly 20,000 babies had been born during the first 105 days of the war — roughly 190 births per day.


In late 2025, however, UNICEF explicitly said there were “fewer births” than before the war. It compared 2022 with 2025 and reported:


  • 2022: about 250 low-birth-weight babies per month, representing 5% of births.
  • First half of 2025: about 300 low-birth-weight babies per month, but this represented 10% of all births, because the total number of births had fallen.
Click to expand...

You care more about their kids than they do
 
Rossboss2908 said:
View attachment 4369
Click to expand...
Great contribution.

I would suggest that some people's obsession with Palestine says everything you need to know about them.

Bad things are happening all over the world at all times. Jews and Arabs have been killing each other forever. Despite that, Jews bad, Palestine good is your pet project.

Saturn is a leftist Jew hater. I don't believe for a second that his heart bleeds for every single Palestinian.

You need to look at the bigger picture.
 
Last edited:
Hrolf The Ganger said:
Great contribution.

I would suggest that some people's obsession with Palestine says everything you need to know about them.

Bad things are happening all over the world at all times. Jews and Arabs have been killing each other ever. Despite that, Jews bad, Palestine good is your pet project.

Saturn is a leftist Jew hater. I don't believe for a second that his heart bleeds for every single Palestinian.

You need to look at the bigger picture.
Click to expand...

It speaks volumes that humanity and empathy are such alien concepts to you.

You constantly say things like 'you need to look at the bigger picture' as if there is depth and substance to your worldview, and yet it's simply parroting what the tabloids have fed you for decades while you cheerlead and bootlick for the most transparently crooked bloke in politics.
Did you ever consider there's a bigger picture than a moronic obsession with immigration?
 
CPFCSaturn said:
It speaks volumes that humanity and empathy are such alien concepts to you.

You constantly say things like 'you need to look at the bigger picture' as if there is depth and substance to your worldview, and yet it's simply parroting what the tabloids have fed you for decades while you cheerlead and bootlick for the most transparently crooked bloke in politics.
Did you ever consider there's a bigger picture than a moronic obsession with immigration?
Click to expand...
Here's my world view sonny.

There is endless tragedy and misery occurring in the world every second of every day. I have to try and look after my tiny piece of that world because that is all I can do.

If world events impact on that, I will side with the course of action most likely to bring a favourable outcome for those important to me. That is not always easy to call, but one makes a choice.

Then there are people like you who are so arrogant, naive and desperate to feel virtuous that you hand pick a single event in Earth's history and claim to have a superior moral outlook on it, like in this case, that Palestinians wearing the white hats and being innocent victims of tyranny.

And in your desperate desire to be 'right on', you rationalise your position with all kinds of stuff about genocide and lack of justification.

You really think you understand what is going on out there?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top