You are quoting from the Hamas 2017 revised version of the original 1988 Hamas charter which includes the aim of the total destruction of Israel, congrats, you have now crossed a legal line.
Last edited:
Israel v Hamas
- Topic starter Forest Hillbilly
- Start date
georgenorman
Member
- Country
England
Rotter.
cryrst
Member
- Location
- The garden of England
- Country
-
England
He’s finally lost the plot oh dear
Any South Londoner would understand this, fraud.
ASCPFC
Member
- Location
- Pro-Cathedral/caravan park
- Country
Ireland
Islam does that quite well enough without any assistance from anyone here. Well, most people here
I am very well paid which allows me to pay me blackmail comfortably.
You are putting the site at risk, hope that makes you happy. are you looking for a BBS medal of some kind.
- Country
-
England
Lol what a drama you are.
No, I said it's OBVIOUS they would. Are you incapable of understanding that actions have consequences? Did you think that Israel would pull out of the WB because of a few sanctions and apologise? Unlike you I knew they'd retaliate, and I told you, that's what makes me patriotic to our nations interests ahead of your fashionable ideological Jew hatred and obsession. You put those territories and our troops at risk. Four funnelled ocean going stupidity
- Country
-
England
The factory was bought by Rafael BEFORE the Oct 7 attack and makes MINE CLEARANCE VEHICLES not weapons.
I'm laughing at you
- Country
-
England
I think you need a holiday.
- Country
-
England
Last edited by a moderator:
- Country
-
England
The site is nothing, he's happy to put the Falklanders at risk for his islamic terrorist friends.
You get my point, use that phrase in public and the police have a decision to make
Mark B
Member
- Country
USA
They will primarily be used outside of Gaza. Not because the Israelis care, but because it is more efficient to send intelligence officers to do Battlefield forensics on what they can collect from the tunnels and then utilized engineers to make it uninhabitable as it is cheaper to destroy those tunnels and command centers in Gaza with engineers with cheap explosives (or even sea water as they often do) then to drop the really expensive bombs from F15s or F35s.
It doesn't have anything to do with being humanitarian, it has to do with fiscal responsibility and intelligence gathering.
Seawater works, a lot of money donated for public works funded the building of the enormous network of tunnels, and everybody knew
ASCPFC
Member
- Location
- Pro-Cathedral/caravan park
- Country
-
Ireland
Over the years, so much aid money has gone into arms.
ASCPFC
Member
- Location
- Pro-Cathedral/caravan park
- Country
-
Ireland
I'd say that they make that choice pretty quickly.
Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
Scotland
So it's a sort of Beetlejuice deal? Well, that was easy.
Last edited by a moderator:
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
Australia
"Do not use the message board as a means to promote political activism"
Last edited by a moderator:
CPFCSaturn
Member
- Country
-
England
My understanding is different - from ChatGPT:
The current $2.8bn package, although calling it a “sale” is technically accurate in the U.S. arms-export system but potentially misleading without explaining how it is financed.
The key distinction is:
- The U.S. is formally describing the package as a Foreign Military Sale (FMS) to Israel.
- But most of the $2.8bn is expected to be paid for using U.S. Foreign Military Financing (FMF). In other words, the U.S. government provides Israel with the money, and Israel uses that money to purchase the U.S. weapons.
- So, yes, U.S. taxpayers are ultimately funding most of this particular “sale.” The Washington Post explicitly reports that the $2.8bn package “would be purchased with U.S. taxpayer dollars.”
- This isn't unusual in the U.S.-Israel relationship. Congress appropriates roughly $3.3bn annually in FMF for Israel under the current assistance framework, with additional supplemental military assistance provided since October 2023.