I'm in the majority on this site that views them as a dangerous rogue state.
Israel v Hamas
- Topic starter Forest Hillbilly
- Start date
I'm in the majority on this site that views them as a dangerous rogue state.
cryrst
Member
- Location
- The garden of England
- Country
England
Rouge ?
Majority? Based on what?
More of a Jew hating marxist who has said he does not believe in God, so yes.
Makes the opening of his speech in Parliament even worse, every time you think he can't stoop any lower he does.
His financial status and residence location in London make him immune to the issues most people in London face on a daily basis.
To paraphrase Beecham, " I have never met him but I once trod in some "
More of a Jew hating marxist who has said he does not believe in God, so yes.
Makes the opening of his speech in Parliament even worse, every time you think he can't stoop any lower he does.
His financial status and residence location in London make him immune to the issues most people in London face on a daily basis.
To paraphrase Beecham, " I have never met him but I once trod in some "
Be hilarious if USA ban him from travelling there
stanzerman
Member
- Location
- Hastings
- Country
-
England
My father who investigated the case at the time said it was a reprisal for the rape of Jewish women by British soldiers.
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
-
England
Strange. They are the first line of defence in the Middle East against radical islam.
South Africa how many? USA elected a traitorous rebel. Kenya and Syria too.
How far back will you go to support your jew hating narrative.
I condemn the atrocities carried out by the Jewish terrorist groups in the lattw]er part of the 1940's, as I would any terrorist group.
You might want to read O Jerusalem , a very non partisan history.
All 784?
So it's the opinion of one person with a narrative, good enough for me
You are now saying 784 British soldiers were hung?
Your posts are what in court would be called tailoring evidence.
Tis a tangled web with you indeed
Penge Eagle
Member
- Location
- Surrey
- Country
-
England
Well you would, seeing as you're a Marxist.
Are you always this much of a pedantic dick?
784 British were murdered by the Israelis, one way or another.
A poster smeared them as 'rapists' but only referred to one case. So I asked if he was implying all 784 of them were guilty. He didn't reply.
But well done to both of you for trying to obfuscate and excuse the murder of British boys and girls serving their country.
Looks and smells like traitorous behaviour.
As Silverhill said, so much for patriotism
Attachments
Last edited:
Are you unanimous in that?
So every combat fatality in that conflict was a murder?
- Total Deaths vs. Hostile Deaths: Official data indicates that between 228 and 397 of the total British deaths were specifically attributed to direct "hostile action" or combat. [1, 2]
- The Remainder: Because overall British military and auxiliary death tolls range from 754 to over 890, the remaining 350 to 500+ fatalities were due to non-hostile causes. This includes vehicle accidents, training incidents, drownings, suicide, and medical illnesses (such as tuberculosis or malaria).
- Your research is rubbish, typically of your ilk distorting or redacting anything to suit your narrative.
- That's what my pedantary shows anyway, and please apologise for your abusive name calling.
[1, 2, 3, 4]
That's Jew hating Marxist, perhaps he is Ed Milliband
Different sources quote different numbers. But it is undeniable that Israelis murdered British personnel in the hundreds, clear even from your figures.
...and it still feels like you and others are trying to belittle that, by distraction and obfuscation in any way possible, including an unsubstantiated slur/allegation of rape.
Calling me a Marxist doesn't really respect our dead, does it?
Nor does redefining terrorist atrocities as 'combat deaths' or 'hostile action'.
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
-
England