Ismaïla Sarr

ASCPFC said:
From Sarr's viewpoint I guess he's nearly thirty and a big club were in for him. No doubt, he wants to be Mane or Salah. Instead, he's here losing to Everton and going through managers at a rate of knots. Whilst the signings are largely kids.
Personally, from my viewpoint, I don't give a f*** but you do have to look at this from Sarr's viewpoint.
This might not just go away and we might have to cut our losses. Which would have been to sell. If, if we had got Fofana and Osorio I wouldn't even care. Trouble is, Osorio is young, we don't need sulky Sarr and stupid Mateta rubbing off on him. Other issue is, I'm sick of Pino's complete ineffectiveness. For the club - something has to give up top. We barely score any goals from open play since around Christmas last year.
Click to expand...
can't argue with this sadly, v Citeh he was on the RIGHT wing and apart from the free kick was rather hopeless
 
Sarr, has been great for us it cant be denied, but after this ridiculous load of self indulgent tripe from his agent, and his own behaviour in the past week or two Palace need to work out a way to get him out , preferably to a Turkish outfit, where his African rights will be fully respected.
 
ASCPFC said:
I love Palace being accused of racism, then having maybe two or three white players in the squad. Hilarious. Hilaireious perhaps.
Click to expand...
Palace haven't been accused of racism. His post could certainly be read as this is a problem that African players face, which is ridiculous in this case but he doesn't mention any clubs or suggest that Palace or Liverpool are racist.

My response to his post would be, 'Are you saying that the collapse of these transfers is down to a racist attitude? to which he would then have to respond.. I would like to see how people have responded to his statement being, as said in previous posts on here, he is an agent, who makes money promoting his clients abilities to clubs and taking a percentage of any transfers that come about as a result.

And I certainly don't love it if Palace are accused of being racist.
 
The irony of the agent appearing to accuse Palace of treating Sarr as a 'commodity.'
The person who is treating Sarr as a commodity is the agent, looking to shift and trade his client so he can earn his hefty commission for doing very little.
I would say Palace has been instrumental in Sarr releasing his early potential and the player deserves plaudits in this regard too.
The person who had little or nothing to do with Sarr's exploits on the field is his agent.
In fact one could argue that the agent should pay Palace a commission as if Sarr does get his move eventually his value will have increased significantly meaning the agent's take from such move will also be much greater!
I have to stretch the logic a bit, but I think I got there in the end!
 
ASCPFC said:
From Sarr's viewpoint I guess he's nearly thirty and a big club were in for him. No doubt, he wants to be Mane or Salah. Instead, he's here losing to Everton and going through managers at a rate of knots. Whilst the signings are largely kids.
Personally, from my viewpoint, I don't give a f*** but you do have to look at this from Sarr's viewpoint.
This might not just go away and we might have to cut our losses. Which would have been to sell. If, if we had got Fofana and Osorio I wouldn't even care. Trouble is, Osorio is young, we don't need sulky Sarr and stupid Mateta rubbing off on him. Other issue is, I'm sick of Pino's complete ineffectiveness. For the club - something has to give up top. We barely score any goals from open play since around Christmas last year.
Click to expand...

Eh? Going through a lot of managers? Only been 2 since he joined. Unless you're referring to his time at watford.
 
Part Time James said:
Is that based on the ratio of seasons in the Prem? Surely Forest and Watford have been through more per Premier League season?
Click to expand...
I remember some years back when Watford were doing their thing, that the average tenure overall of our managers was similar or lower. Off the top of my head ours had managed something like 9-11 months on average. We're forgetting a couple of walkouts, some interims, some comebacks and gone again, some arguments plus the obvious de Boer. I'm not the best for specifics but it feels like there's been seasons with three managers.
We should insist Hodgson, Warnock and Pardew should just count as one - no matter how many times we use them again.
 
ASCPFC said:
I remember some years back when Watford were doing their thing, that the average tenure overall of our managers was similar or lower. Off the top of my head ours had managed something like 9-11 months on average. We're forgetting a couple of walkouts, some interims, some comebacks and gone again, some arguments plus the obvious de Boer. I'm not the best for specifics but it feels like there's been seasons with three managers.
We should insist Hodgson, Warnock and Pardew should just count as one - no matter how many times we use them again.
Click to expand...
Interesting. One day we'll hire someone mediocre enough to a) not attract attention elsewhere b) not be on death's door and c) not be so sh*t we can't achieve 17th
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top