More ad hominem personal abuse from the hypocrite who wanted everyone to be nice to each other, plus ca change
Last edited:
More covid
- Topic starter Teddy Eagle
- Start date
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
It's called learning from experience.
Good to know his experience is more valid than mine.
At least you learnt something today, always a good day when that happens
Such an insecure bunch, you lot. Can’t have anything that even gets close to challenging your world views in case it gets proven false.
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
I know people who prefer the 'other' and romanicise anything that isn't from their own tradition.
It's been an identified mental flaw of the left and something Orwell wrote about back in his day.
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
Projection.
You have been rinsed so often on this platform yet you haven't changed at all.
You're accusing people of your own behaviour.
Mattconrov
Member
- Country
-
England
Not wishing to go off topic Dan. We all take people as they come, whatever race, religion or gender. So we can make collective comments about groups, but also be respectful when we meet an individual of the group.
I take the Tommy Robinson approach on Muslims. Tommy has a bigger problem with Islam than actual Muslims. It's the teachings and the way it is changing a predominantly Christian country.
Anyway back to convid; it was an absolute SCAM.
Hahahahahaha. You really do live in a weird version of reality.
You lot couldn’t rinse a dishcloth.
Surely one of your 100 employees needs to speak to you, Centurion Dan
But now he can't get all tough and tell us not to bully Wisbech because of his age, that would be offensive to Wisbech, from the horse's mouth
Oh the irony.
You're the one defending the ludicrous establishment covid narrative, remember?
You’re the one parroting the views of Matt le Tissier.
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
-
England
I'm sure there is still people on here that think COVID came from a man eating a bat in a market 🤣
Mattconrov
Member
- Country
-
England
The funniest thing is, covid didn't even exist in the first place.
I took a glance at the flu figures from the world heath organisations official site back in 2021. Flu had disappeared. I wonder where it went. 🤔
Mattconrov
Member
- Country
-
England
I think that's a compliment Dan, not an insult .
Saying you're parroting the government, is an insult.
Dogburger
Member
- Location
- Somewhere at a Cup Winners party
- Country
-
England
The same place colds go when we get the flu . Our immune systems kick in ,viral interference takes place and one active infection blocks the other
But to say covid didn't exist is just an insult to those who died and those who had it bad many of which are still suffering from the consequences of it .
I really do find it quite amazing that people still spout this uneducated nonsense
Nutmegyeti
Member
- Country
-
England
How Covid started is one debate. Whether it came from a lab, a wet market or somewhere else is something people can argue over. Whether governments got every decision right is another debate entirely.
But claiming Covid wasn’t real, or that it wasn’t a serious disease, is absolute horseshit.
I lost my father to Covid. He went out once during the Christmas 2020 period to put petrol in the car and caught it. He was 72, nearly 73. He’d had a mini-stroke years earlier, had high blood pressure and was diabetic. The reality is that a bad bout of flu might well have killed him too, but he’d been vaccinated against flu. Covid was what he caught, Covid pneumonia was what took him.
One of the first things they did was discuss a do-not-resuscitate decision with him. In the conversation I had with the consultant on the Thursday, they explained that, despite the fact he was up, talking and actually seemed more lucid than he had been in the days leading up to his admission, they fully expected him to be in a significantly worse condition by the Saturday morning. He was.
I’ve had Covid myself. It left me with long Covid and damage to part of my lungs. Before that, I’d always had a strong immune system.
And just to be clear, I wasn’t someone who blindly supported every lockdown measure either.
I think the first lockdown was probably necessary because nobody really knew what we were dealing with. After that, I think the focus should have shifted towards controlling the spread, protecting the vulnerable and allowing people to make sensible decisions, rather than repeatedly trying to lock down an entire population. If a virus spreads through people mixing, there was always going to come a point where many people would catch it regardless. You can’t realistically keep a whole country locked down forever.
I also remember driving through Leicester in June 2020. At the time there were constant reports about the city being hit particularly hard and facing additional restrictions and that it was so unfair due to the ethnic makeup and reliance on family mixing in those communities.
As I drove through, I personally saw very little evidence of social distancing in the areas I passed through. That was my own observation, and it reinforced to me just how difficult it was going to be to contain a virus if large numbers of people continued to mix normally.
Then the reports were those communities were being hit harder and the Government needed to do more.
To me, that sums up the impossible position governments were in. If they imposed restrictions, they were accused of authoritarianism or discrimination. If they didn’t, they were accused of negligence. Whatever they chose, they were going to be criticised. They were, in many respects, damned if they did and damned if they didn’t.
But the thing that has stayed with me wasn’t losing my dad. 72 is a shame, not a tradgedy.
In the room next to him was a 26-year-old woman who had given birth to twins only six months earlier. At three o’clock in the morning, I watched her being wheeled up to intensive care. That image was a killer.
She did survive, thankfully, but her recovery was a hard one.
So by all means we should debate where Covid came from. Debate lockdowns. Debate masks. Debate vaccines. Debate what governments should or shouldn’t have done differently. Those are all legitimate discussions.
But to say Covid wasn’t real, or that it was just a bad cold, or that it only affected people who were about to die anyway is bollocks.
But claiming Covid wasn’t real, or that it wasn’t a serious disease, is absolute horseshit.
I lost my father to Covid. He went out once during the Christmas 2020 period to put petrol in the car and caught it. He was 72, nearly 73. He’d had a mini-stroke years earlier, had high blood pressure and was diabetic. The reality is that a bad bout of flu might well have killed him too, but he’d been vaccinated against flu. Covid was what he caught, Covid pneumonia was what took him.
One of the first things they did was discuss a do-not-resuscitate decision with him. In the conversation I had with the consultant on the Thursday, they explained that, despite the fact he was up, talking and actually seemed more lucid than he had been in the days leading up to his admission, they fully expected him to be in a significantly worse condition by the Saturday morning. He was.
I’ve had Covid myself. It left me with long Covid and damage to part of my lungs. Before that, I’d always had a strong immune system.
And just to be clear, I wasn’t someone who blindly supported every lockdown measure either.
I think the first lockdown was probably necessary because nobody really knew what we were dealing with. After that, I think the focus should have shifted towards controlling the spread, protecting the vulnerable and allowing people to make sensible decisions, rather than repeatedly trying to lock down an entire population. If a virus spreads through people mixing, there was always going to come a point where many people would catch it regardless. You can’t realistically keep a whole country locked down forever.
I also remember driving through Leicester in June 2020. At the time there were constant reports about the city being hit particularly hard and facing additional restrictions and that it was so unfair due to the ethnic makeup and reliance on family mixing in those communities.
As I drove through, I personally saw very little evidence of social distancing in the areas I passed through. That was my own observation, and it reinforced to me just how difficult it was going to be to contain a virus if large numbers of people continued to mix normally.
Then the reports were those communities were being hit harder and the Government needed to do more.
To me, that sums up the impossible position governments were in. If they imposed restrictions, they were accused of authoritarianism or discrimination. If they didn’t, they were accused of negligence. Whatever they chose, they were going to be criticised. They were, in many respects, damned if they did and damned if they didn’t.
But the thing that has stayed with me wasn’t losing my dad. 72 is a shame, not a tradgedy.
In the room next to him was a 26-year-old woman who had given birth to twins only six months earlier. At three o’clock in the morning, I watched her being wheeled up to intensive care. That image was a killer.
She did survive, thankfully, but her recovery was a hard one.
So by all means we should debate where Covid came from. Debate lockdowns. Debate masks. Debate vaccines. Debate what governments should or shouldn’t have done differently. Those are all legitimate discussions.
But to say Covid wasn’t real, or that it was just a bad cold, or that it only affected people who were about to die anyway is bollocks.
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
-
England
Mattconrov
Member
- Country
-
England
It's an insult that many people died because of a fake disease. It's to honour the dead and those that suffered that I preach the truth.
Your idea of viral interference make no sense and surely not based on any common sense.
Viruses didn't go away and hide in a corner while "covid" started. They exist side by side now dont they. People still get "covid" and the flu. Answer that and stay fashionable.
You want to talk about uneducated responses pal. I bet you know bugger all about the pcr test and how it to contributed to the scam.
Let's see if you can explain the pcr test. When you come back with official waffle and nonsense that even the inventor laughed at; I'll educate you.
Viruses have never been isolated, including the "covid virus" it was certainly not subjected to the koch or rivers postulates.
This was just rebranded flu. You sir are an insult to the suffering, perpetuating main stream government drivel.