More covid

Stirlingsays said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2081335034242355428
Click to expand...
this year, EVERY one of my jobs, the family has had a single or multiple loss to cancer OR one of them are undergoing treatment.
1 poor chap lost a child last year, his son is undergoing this year as is he and his wife was diagnosed with it on my 2nd job.
Ive been having chemo since late last year(Multiple Myloma) but still work as and when.
Having spoken with the nurses on a regular basis this year, they say its ' through the roof' for want of a better term.
it'll get worse too.
 
chris123 said:
Including comments about the vaccine causing cancer in the Royal family?
Click to expand...
He may have mentioned that. To be fair I'm more interested as I was back in 2021, how these new mrna jabs caused a tremendous immune system response. I believe it's called a cytoklin response. The immune system attacks healthy parts of the body, indiscriminately.

Edit.

Many people warned about the dangers of the jab in 2020. They unfortunately lost their voice on the Internet and tv. Hence many were never able to hear an alternative view.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
DanH said:
Heartily recommend chucking this lad’s name in to Google. Imagine my shock that he’s discredited all over the shop by actual reputable scientists.

Click to expand...

Are you claiming the statistics are a lie?

The truth is coming about the realities of the covid vaccines, which have largely been protected in the media. You will have to take responsibility for your naivety and attacks.

The deaths of the old can be hand-waved and formulas can be changed to hide inconvenience.....but the statistics of outcomes of the young between those that were vaccinated against those that weren't.

You can't escape that.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Are you claiming the statistics are a lie?

The truth is coming about the realities of the covid vaccines, which have largely been protected in the media. You will have to take responsibility for your naivety and attacks.

The deaths of the old can be hand-waved and formulas can be changed to hide inconvenience.....but the statistics of outcomes of the young between those that were vaccinated against those that weren't.

You can't escape that.
Click to expand...

Just extremely unreliable from a tiny data set.

In summary, Hulscher et al. attributed 28 deaths to COVID‐19 vaccine‐induced myocarditis and attempted to extrapolate these findings to discussions on population excess risk associated with COVID‐19 vaccination. Research on both the pathophysiological and population‐level evidence on vaccine safety is crucial. However, we believe Hulscher et al.’s paper was problematic in two key ways. First, the individual‐level causal effects of COVID‐19 vaccination on these 28 deaths were poorly justified. Second, the lack of information on myocarditis risk both at baseline and following COVID‐19 infection precludes the estimation of excess risk of myocarditis attributable to vaccination in the population. Given these limitations, we believe the conclusions of this review should be restrained to appropriately reflect its study design and methods; the interpretations of findings as causal and discussions of excess population‐level risk were inappropriate. Correspondingly, we believe this review fails to appropriately evaluate and communicate the impact of COVID‐19 vaccination on myocarditis mortality.

This is also the same guy that claimed that suncream caused skin cancer because he completely misinterpreted the research:

annielab.org

Analysis: Viral post misleadingly links sunscreen use to higher cancer risk | annie lab

Researchers tied the apparent link to behavioral factors, such as higher UV exposure and insufficient sunscreen use, not sunscreen itself
annielab.org annielab.org

You do this time and time again - starting with your prejudged conclusion and working backwards to crowbar in any evidence you can find, no matter how flimsy, rather than trying to find anything robust and backed up.
 
Last edited:
DanH said:
You do this time and time again - starting then your prejudged conclusion and working backwards to crowbar in any evidence you can find, no matter how flimsy, rather than trying to find anything robust and backed up.
Click to expand...

Forgive them father, for they are blind and do not see.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Forgive those father who decide outcomes and then search for evidence to support them for they are suffering from RWP.

Oxford University can develop a vaccine against new infections in a matter of weeks these days. Sadly not yet against a psychosis.
Click to expand...

Doesn't really work with you....with you being aggressively anti religion.

I could imagine a world where Dan is just misguided on this.....with you however, I seriously doubt whether you'd give a damn if it were true.
 
DanH said:
Just extremely unreliable from a tiny data set.

In summary, Hulscher et al. attributed 28 deaths to COVID‐19 vaccine‐induced myocarditis and attempted to extrapolate these findings to discussions on population excess risk associated with COVID‐19 vaccination. Research on both the pathophysiological and population‐level evidence on vaccine safety is crucial. However, we believe Hulscher et al.’s paper was problematic in two key ways. First, the individual‐level causal effects of COVID‐19 vaccination on these 28 deaths were poorly justified. Second, the lack of information on myocarditis risk both at baseline and following COVID‐19 infection precludes the estimation of excess risk of myocarditis attributable to vaccination in the population. Given these limitations, we believe the conclusions of this review should be restrained to appropriately reflect its study design and methods; the interpretations of findings as causal and discussions of excess population‐level risk were inappropriate. Correspondingly, we believe this review fails to appropriately evaluate and communicate the impact of COVID‐19 vaccination on myocarditis mortality.

This is also the same guy that claimed that suncream caused skin cancer because he completely misinterpreted the research:

annielab.org

Analysis: Viral post misleadingly links sunscreen use to higher cancer risk | annie lab

Researchers tied the apparent link to behavioral factors, such as higher UV exposure and insufficient sunscreen use, not sunscreen itself
annielab.org annielab.org

You do this time and time again - starting with your prejudged conclusion and working backwards to crowbar in any evidence you can find, no matter how flimsy, rather than trying to find anything robust and backed up.
Click to expand...
Mate, lay off the Ai. Lol
 
Last edited:
The issues that were stated before the "vaccine" came to market are coming to fruition.

The mrna is not to be used as a vaccine because it attacks healthy organs and parts of the body indiscriminately.

Don't listen to me. Listern to the experts.
It's easy to roll out government approved information. Why are successful brilliant people telling us the dangers. This has only brought them trouble.
 
Last edited:
Wisbech Eagle said:
Forgive those father who decide outcomes and then search for evidence to support them for they are suffering from RWP.

Oxford University can develop a vaccine against new infections in a matter of weeks these days. Sadly not yet against a psychosis.
Click to expand...
Plenty of pills for it Mr Wisbech.
 
DanH said:
Heartily recommend chucking this lad’s name in to Google. Imagine my shock that he’s discredited all over the shop by actual reputable scientists.

Click to expand...

Who decides which scientists are 'reputable'? Is it the trillion-dollar, ultra-capitalist, profit-driven pharmaceutical industry?
Imagine my shock to see you conned into being one of the establishment's obedient sock puppets. Once again.
 
McAhuna said:
Who decides which scientists are 'reputable'? Is it the trillion-dollar, ultra-capitalist, profit-driven pharmaceutical industry?
Imagine my shock to see you conned into being one of the establishment's obedient sock puppets. Once again.
Click to expand...
Funny thing is, there are plenty of reputable scientists that agree with you and me.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Are you claiming the statistics are a lie?

The truth is coming about the realities of the covid vaccines, which have largely been protected in the media. You will have to take responsibility for your naivety and attacks.

The deaths of the old can be hand-waved and formulas can be changed to hide inconvenience.....but the statistics of outcomes of the young between those that were vaccinated against those that weren't.

You can't escape that.
Click to expand...

You all miss the point

Had the lockdowns and vaccines not happened then medical services would've been overwhelmed, and no western government could've allowed it, and it would've certainly led to fat more death and chaos.

It was never like the polio vaccine, and I guess that'll STUPIDLY get turned against thanks to this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top