Lacroix

Absolutely correct, however Glasner arrived at our club on the back of 10 years in management and was successful at Wolfsburg and Eintracht Frankfurt leading to the latter to a European Trophy.
Sage has limited managerial experience and that in Ligue 1 which is not viewed as challenging as the Bundesliga. I accept that Sage was successful with Lens last season.
Sage was successful with both Lens and Lyon, taking into account the state he walked into each respectively.

Prior to Lyon he had experience as a coach.

The Bundesliga vs Ligue 1 debate can be beaten to a pulp.
 
Sage was successful with both Lens and Lyon, taking into account the state he walked into each respectively.

Prior to Lyon he had experience as a coach.

The Bundesliga vs Ligue 1 debate can be beaten to a pulp.
My comments were not a criticism of Sage, I recognised his outstanding success at Lens last season and of course I wish him well at our club.
I was merely highlighting the differences in managerial experience.
 
Everyone on here keeps saying 52, it's 51 according to Sky and all the other sites. Either way, it is indeed a poor fee for a player who is worth far more than that to us (and to the receiving team too frankly).

Yep, ins vs outs will start to look increasingly unjustifiable.
i think the £51m to £52m discrepancy is as the price appears to be 60m Euro. Converting that at today's FX gives £51m , however, a few weeks back it was nearer £52m.

This of course raises a couple of questions.

Why are 2 English clubs dealing in Euro? If they are maybe Lacroix did have a release clause. I'm not convinced by this as if he did it would surely have been leaked.

I think i read that Sunderland deal in Euros for their purchases, however, these are predominantly European transfers. Maybe Chelsea do the same.

If this is the price we got for Lacroix i am definitely disappointed. It's not unreasonable, but i think he is so important to us we needed more.
 
My comments were not a criticism of Sage, I recognised his outstanding success at Lens last season and of course I wish him well at our club.
I was merely highlighting the differences in managerial experience.
I know you were not criticising him, and didn't take it "personally" on his behalf.

I was merely pointing out the fact that their managerial experience isn't as far apart from each other as it may appear on the surface.
 
i think the £51m to £52m discrepancy is as the price appears to be 60m Euro. Converting that at today's FX gives £51m , however, a few weeks back it was nearer £52m.

This of course raises a couple of questions.

Why are 2 English clubs dealing in Euro? If they are maybe Lacroix did have a release clause. I'm not convinced by this as if he did it would surely have been leaked.

I think i read that Sunderland deal in Euros for their purchases, however, these are predominantly European transfers. Maybe Chelsea do the same.

If this is the price we got for Lacroix i am definitely disappointed. It's not unreasonable, but i think he is so important to us we needed more.
The report from Sky and others re Lacroix has always been in Pounds Sterling. The deals for the two young replacements have been reported in Euros.
 
Only the top clubs can afford their top players to stay until they are old, worth less and no longer needed e.g Salah, de Bryne. Clubs like us have to sell them high to be able to replace and progress. At some point either the player wants out (eze, olise, guehi) or we need to try and cash in at their probable peak at whatever age that is (wan bisaka, lacroiux). There are also agents agitating for a move, triple wages on offer and players looking for champions league experience. We kept Zaha until he was past his use by date (the second time after the manure chaos) and he left for a pultry amount. He could have gone a few years sooner for 70m. Its a complicated balancing act. Enjoy the roller coaster.
 
Lacroix is held up by his work permit , ive been told , being he is going to Chelsea he doesn't need to work for his money , 🤔
Surely there can't be much to complicate the work permit for a full France international moving from one English top division club to another English top division club?

In fact, surely he already has a valid UK work permit, and given he would be immediately switching to the new "company" without any free agency, his current work permit should be valid?
 
Surely there can't be much to complicate the work permit for a full France international moving from one English top division club to another English top division club?

In fact, surely he already has a valid UK work permit, and given he would be immediately switching to the new "company" without any free agency, his current work permit should be valid?
I think our resident border force expert can confirm but I believe a work permit is linked to a job. Otherwise people would come to the UK as carers and then switch to other jobs which are not covered by the scheme. Thank god that doesn't happen. 😀

Anyway good news I have found the paperwork for Laxcroix's permit application.

1. Can you confirm your identity. Yes
2. Do you have a criminal record. No
3. Will you be a burden to the taxpayer. Err no I am a multi millionaire footballer so a net contributor.

Border Force Comments
Err boss what do I do with this one, he's answered all the questions wrong.


Me: Sorry I know wrong thread but it was too good an opportunity. I'll get my coat.
 
Surely there can't be much to complicate the work permit for a full France international moving from one English top division club to another English top division club?

In fact, surely he already has a valid UK work permit, and given he would be immediately switching to the new "company" without any free agency, his current work permit should be valid?

maybe, now chelsea will have 10 centre backs he's having to convince the relevant people that he is going to play enough games.
 
The report from Sky and others re Lacroix has always been in Pounds Sterling. The deals for the two young replacements have been reported in Euros.
?? Strange reply.
You asked the question why the transfer fee (which is a slightly strange figure) has been reported as a different value via different media outlets. I have explained how the discrepancy may have arisen.

Of course all UK networks will report in GBP as that is our currency, i'm not sure what your point is.
It is the FX rate movement that may be accounting for say BBC still reporting £52m and Sky sticking with £51m.

To add some logic to my theory before the WC it was reported that Chelsea had bid £47m for Lacroix, or 55m Euro. I did wonder why the Euro figure was even quoted.
 
Only the top clubs can afford their top players to stay until they are old, worth less and no longer needed e.g Salah, de Bryne. Clubs like us have to sell them high to be able to replace and progress. At some point either the player wants out (eze, olise, guehi) or we need to try and cash in at their probable peak at whatever age that is (wan bisaka, lacroiux). There are also agents agitating for a move, triple wages on offer and players looking for champions league experience. We kept Zaha until he was past his use by date (the second time after the manure chaos) and he left for a pultry amount. He could have gone a few years sooner for 70m. Its a complicated balancing act. Enjoy the roller coaster.
Zaha left on a bosman after running down his contract. Maybe you are confusing his exit with Benteke's where we did get a small fee.

To my knowledge no club bid £70m for Wilf. I think Arsenal bid about £40m ish to test the water and then Everton came in with a higher bid but it included 2 of their players as makeweights. Both bids were c 3 years before he left.
 
Really disappointed in losing Lacroix. He said he wanted Champions League football. So why go to Chelsea? They're not in it!
I should imagine like any modern day footballers it’s all about the money mainly. Although I suspect any of our top players probably know it’s gone as far it’s it’s going to go with us. We can’t carry on punching above our weight and selling our best players, eventually it’s going to catch up with us, even though it’s what we have to do to survive and keep trying to compete at this level
 
Only the top clubs can afford their top players to stay until they are old, worth less and no longer needed e.g Salah, de Bryne. Clubs like us have to sell them high to be able to replace and progress. At some point either the player wants out (eze, olise, guehi) or we need to try and cash in at their probable peak at whatever age that is (wan bisaka, lacroiux). There are also agents agitating for a move, triple wages on offer and players looking for champions league experience. We kept Zaha until he was past his use by date (the second time after the manure chaos) and he left for a pultry amount. He could have gone a few years sooner for 70m. Its a complicated balancing act. Enjoy the roller coaster.
This was Parish's valuation, no club fell for it.
 
Zaha left on a bosman after running down his contract. Maybe you are confusing his exit with Benteke's where we did get a small fee.

To my knowledge no club bid £70m for Wilf. I think Arsenal bid about £40m ish to test the water and then Everton came in with a higher bid but it included 2 of their players as makeweights. Both bids were c 3 years before he left.
The Everton Director of Sport Marcel Brands has publicly stated (about 3 months after the event) that Everton only made one bid for Zaha, circa £52 million, despite lots of news outlets reporting a second bid involving other players to make up a sum of circa £70 million no such second bid was made.
 
In fairness to parish. Wilf pretty much kept us up every season and that's 100 million + each season we get. He may not have been worth that to clubs like arsenal but he certainly was for us.

Its a fair point. Never worth 70m, but pretty priceless for us.

I always wonder if holding on to Wilf too long, would have prevented others signing with us (nervy about getting trapped)
 
Its a fair point. Never worth 70m, but pretty priceless for us.

I always wonder if holding on to Wilf too long, would have prevented others signing with us (nervy about getting trapped)

Perhaps that's why olise and Eze had release clauses? Maybe Wharton even has one? 😱
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top