Grooming gangs

[PalazioVecchio]

Where is the outrage that followed the Stephen Lawrence case ? The hounding and in-depth reporting on the suspects ? The media quest for justice and to hold those accountable ?

I cannot answer that question cos it would likely get me into trouble.

 

[cryrst]

Makes you wonder if labour Bringing in the ban on certain sites will try to hide the info ref grooming. Maybe inadvertently kids could possibly fall foul of these gangs without seeing the signs from kids who went there. Alternatively the cynic in me wonders if it is to check who is commenting and naming names because for the love of god how did it carry on and at a minimum where were the families trying to stop it. If you really believe the wives, girlfriends, brothers and sisters etc didn’t know you are a dumb ass.

 

[DanH]

And what percentage of Asians are Pakistani Muslims? Less than 3%.

Even sensible Muslim spokesman accept the failure of Muslim leaders to acknowledge the problems within the so called Muslim community.

You are an idealist delusional and not too bright. It pains me to see people so desperate to avoid the obvious simply to defend an ideological position. You really are the problem.

None of you care about any form of reality. Just dismiss facts and statistics, and actual proper journalism out of hand because you don’t like them.

You’re fed things you want to hear and want to believe. Try and look at things in the round rather than your myopic view.

 

[Stirlingsays]

None of you care about any form of reality. Just dismiss facts and statistics, and actual proper journalism out of hand because you don’t like them.

You’re fed things you want to hear and want to believe. Try and look at things in the round rather than your myopic view.

If that's how you feel.

What on earth are you doing hanging around us?

Go break bread with your soys and trannies instead.

It's weird that you come on here hate watching and whining like a b1tch.

Go enjoy your life.

 

[cryrst]

The Statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs

www.grooming-gangs.independent-inquiry.uk

Here is the link. Terms of reference does mention ethnicity and associated traits. This is important because allegedly a majority or large amount of grooming is and was carried out by non whites.
Being careful with my words tbh.

 

[DanH]

If that's how you feel.

What on earth are you doing hanging around us?

Go break bread with your soys and trannies instead.

It's weird that you come on here hate watching and whining like a b1tch.

Go enjoy your life.

You’d rather your own little whiney boy playground with no one challenging you on anything then?

Thought you were all about free speech?

 

[HKOwen]

If that's how you feel.

What on earth are you doing hanging around us?

Go break bread with your soys and trannies instead.

It's weird that you come on here hate watching and whining like a b1tch.

Go enjoy your life.

It's a bizarre Wisbech Eagle homage act, seems there is a fetish for being contrarian.

 

[DanH]

It's a bizarre Wisbech Eagle homage act, seems there is a fetish for being contrarian.

So only your own likeminded opinions are allowed on here are they? You just can’t deal with any form of challenge or scrutiny.

Remember when this site hasn’t gone down the rabbit hole.

 

[Stirlingsays]

You’d rather your own little whiney boy playground with no one challenging you on anything then?

Thought you were all about free speech?

Strawman much?

Firstly you don't challenge because it's just either insults or criticism. When your views are challenged you refuse to engage with the pushback.....How is that challenging when you can't take the challenge back?

Free speech? Who is stopping your free speech?
I didn't say your couldn't do it.....though progressives (which is your politics) ban anyone from challenging them on their sites. These are your people and the hypocrisy is off the charts.

Do your go on the bbs and criticise their attitude to free speech?.....I highly doubt it.

Dan being a hate watcher who spends his time whining is what you have turned into on here.

That was your choice.

 

[DanH]

Strawman much?

Firstly you don't challenge because it's just either insults or criticism. When your views are challenged you refuse to engage with the pushback.....How is that challenging when you can't take the challenge back?

Free speech? Who is stopping your free speech?
I didn't say your couldn't do it.....though progressives (which is your politics) ban anyone from challenging them on their sites. These are your people and the hypocrisy is off the charts.

Do your go on the bbs and criticise their attitude to free speech?.....I highly doubt it.

Dan being a hate watcher who spends his time whining is what you have turned into on here.

That was your choice.

‘What on earth are you doing hanging around us?

Go break bread with your soys and trannies instead.’

This isn’t your site. It’s a Crystal Palace fans’ site.

And you are far less representative of the people that actually go to games, just the people on this board. Just ask Owen how his ‘meet up’ went.

 

[eaglesdare]

Strawman much?

Firstly you don't challenge because it's just either insults or criticism. When your views are challenged you refuse to engage with the pushback.....How is that challenging when you can't take the challenge back?

Free speech? Who is stopping your free speech?
I didn't say your couldn't do it.....though progressives (which is your politics) ban anyone from challenging them on their sites. These are your people and the hypocrisy is off the charts.

Do your go on the bbs and criticise their attitude to free speech?.....I highly doubt it.

Dan being a hate watcher who spends his time whining is what you have turned into on here.

That was your choice.

One good thing about the under 16s social media ban is that we won't hear from Dantifa for a few years. 🤣

 

[DanH]

One good thing about the under 16s social media ban is that we won't hear from Dantifa for a few years. 🤣

 

[Stirlingsays]

‘What on earth are you doing hanging around us?

Go break bread with your soys and trannies instead.’

This isn’t your site. It’s a Crystal Palace fans’ site.

And you are far less representative of the people that actually go to games, just the people on this board. Just ask Owen how his ‘meet up’ went.

Errrr.....you have literally told me to leave the site and go 'touch grass' previously.....but you have an issue when you're told to do that yourself? Buy a mirror Dan.

As for your hate watching....that's valid to criticise. As is your refusal to engage when challenged on your own arguments....again valid.

Nowhere in that is anyone saying you shouldn't have free speech.....the main site that refuses free speech for people challenging opinions is the progressive bbs site..... your people.

I'm less representative? Hang on hypocrite....aren't you meant to be for minority rights?

Are you about majority rule on stuff then?.....but only when it suits you?

If you didn't have double standards.....

 

[DanH]

Errrr.....you have literally told me to leave the site and go 'touch grass' previously.....but you have an issue when you're told to do that yourself? Buy a mirror Dan.

As for your hate watching....that's valid to criticise. As is your refusal to engage when challenged on your own arguments....again valid.

Nowhere in that is anyone saying you shouldn't have free speech.....the main site that refuses free speech for people challenging opinions is the progressive bbs site..... your people.

I'm less representative? Hang on hypocrite....aren't you meant to be for minority rights?

Are you about majority rule on stuff then?.....but only when it suits you?

If you didn't have double standards.....

Why use one sentence when you can use twenty. Another load of waffle.

This isn’t your site. I have just as much a right to post here as you do.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Why use one sentence when you can use twenty. Another load of waffle.

This isn’t your site. I have just as much a right to post here as you do.

I've never said you couldn't post here....Stop avoiding the points.

It's valid to criticise hate watching and call out the weird way you use the site.

The guy who 'challenges' and then avoids being challenged by refusing to engage in good faith.

Because your arguments have more holes than Swiss cheese and I can only summise that you hold these positions out of emotionalism.

 

[DanH]

I've never said you couldn't post here....Stop avoiding the points.

It's valid to criticise hate watching and call out the weird way you use the site.

The guy who 'challenges' and then avoids being challenged by refusing to engage in good faith.

Every single thing I’ve posted on here in the last 48 hours has just been dismissed out of hand without any sort of single robust challenge to the actual content. Just attacking me.

You lot have no interest in actual debate, free speech, or genuine challenge. Just preconceived ideas and judgements based on what you think to be true and don’t want to be proven otherwise as it makes your whole world of make believe fall apart.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Every single thing I’ve posted on here in the last 48 hours has just been dismissed out of hand without any sort of single robust challenge to the actual content. Just attacking me.

You lot have no interest in actual debate, free speech, or genuine challenge. Just preconceived ideas and judgements based on what you think to be true and don’t want to be proven otherwise as it makes your whole world of make believe fall apart.

?

What actual argument have you made Dan rather than just attacking people?

Not an actual post I've seen anyway.

If I've missed it then fair enough, repost it here.

As for your criticisms of us, that's just how I see you. Which is why I question you spending your time around people you dislike so much.

Hate watching is weirdo behaviour.

 

[DanH]

?

What actual argument have you made Dan rather than just attacking people?

Not an actual post I've seen anyway.

If I've missed it then fair enough, repost it here.

Not seen my post with actual evidence about 85% of recorded grooming gangs being white?

The one you got your mate Grok on to try and dismiss rather than use your own brain?

 

[Stirlingsays]

Not seen my post with actual evidence about 85% of recorded grooming gangs being white?

The one you got your mate Grok on to try and dismiss rather than use your own brain?

Yes I saw that I picked the holes in it.

To which you 'dismissed' without answering any of the points.

Why are you criticising me for using secondary sources when that's where you got your info from? When though as Grok points out what you wrote was misleading.

I've answered that kind of point many times in the past, but apparently you get to lecture me on how I do it going forward?

What are you saying Dan? That you shouldn't get challenged on what you write?
Yet you can challenge?

 

[McAhuna]

Google AI, drawing on the notoriously far-right and biased sources ...err... Channel 4 and Sky news, says this

• Missing Data: Experts and audits (including the Baroness Casey review) highlight that the ethnicity of perpetrators is not recorded in roughly two-thirds of cases, making national conclusions difficult to draw. [1, 2]
• Institutional vs. Street Gangs: When data is refined to exclude institutional abuse (like abuse in schools, churches, or children's homes) and family-committed offences, the proportion of white suspects drops, and certain ethnic minority groups—particularly British Pakistani men—show significant statistical over-representation relative to their demographic size. [1, 2, 3]