Censorship and Social Media

[DanH]

Go on then you galaxy brains, I’ll humour you. Explain how please and provide examples.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Go on then you galaxy brains, I’ll humour you. Explain how please and provide examples.

You have some cheek asking others to explain positions and provide examples when you're most often a hit and runner poster who not only trolls and leaves (no real issue with that) but who then ignores points made back to you and pretty much every request for a response.

Yet here you are asking for a response...the very thing you ignore yourself.....Typical 'progressive'.
Talk about owning no mirrors.

You would expect it to be base 101 egalitarianism, which you guys lie about believing in.

Don't expect more from others than you do yourself.

 

[Stirlingsays]

You haven’t “rested” it!

You have rewritten it!

I bought a padlock for it.

 

[DanH]

You have some cheek asking others to explain positions and provide examples when you're most often a hit and runner poster who not only trolls and leaves (no real issue with that) but who then ignores points made back to you and pretty much every request for a response.

Yet here you are asking for a response...the very thing you ignore yourself.....Typical 'progressive'.
Talk about owning no mirrors.

You would expect it to be base 101 egalitarianism, which you guys lie about believing in.

Don't expect more from others than you do yourself.

Is there any post you don’t respond to?

 

[Stirlingsays]

Is there any post you don’t respond to?

B1tchy....but kind of valid.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I bought a padlock for it.

Please keep it safely locked away in a dark room until eternity. Such opinions ought never see the light of day. They are a disservice to human intelligence.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Call it whatever you want. The point stands. I’m done here 👍

Your point was that in performing an abortion or circumcision the clinician knowingly did harm. Every time! NOT that they could do harm by accident, which is an inherent possibility with every procedure.

Thus your point doesn’t stand. It fell at the very first hurdle and has by now become dog meat via the knackers yard.

 

[eaglesdare]

Your point was that in performing an abortion or circumcision the clinician knowingly did harm. Every time! NOT that they could do harm by accident, which is an inherent possibility with every procedure.

Thus your point doesn’t stand. It fell at the very first hurdle and has by now become dog meat via the knackers yard.

My point was that clinicians can do harm and it stands. You already admitted that they can so....Moving on 👍

 

[DanH]

Your point was that in performing an abortion or circumcision the clinician knowingly did harm. Every time! NOT that they could do harm by accident, which is an inherent possibility with every procedure.

Thus your point doesn’t stand. It fell at the very first hurdle and has by now become dog meat via the knackers yard.

Not sure why you bother. It’s like trying to rationalise with some mince in the fridge that’s become sentient.

 

[Phil’s Barber]

You have some cheek asking others to explain positions and provide examples when you're most often a hit and runner poster who not only trolls and leaves (no real issue with that) but who then ignores points made back to you and pretty much every request for a response.

Yet here you are asking for a response...the very thing you ignore yourself.....Typical 'progressive'.
Talk about owning no mirrors.

You would expect it to be base 101 egalitarianism, which you guys lie about believing in.

Don't expect more from others than you do yourself.

Dan H is the coward of HoL.

Can’t or won’t back up his posts, disappears from threads when it becomes awkward or a bit too hot to handle and yet on the other hand, still expects a full in depth explanation when he requests one…total hypocrite.

 

[eaglesdare]

Dan H is the coward of HoL.

Can’t or won’t back up his posts, disappears from threads when it becomes awkward or a bit too hot to handle and yet on the other hand, still expects a full in depth explanation when he requests one…total hypocrite.

Best to just hit the ignore button like I have. Eventually he will go away like a bad smell.

 

[georgenorman]

Not sure why you bother. It’s like trying to rationalise with some mince in the fridge that’s become sentient.

I guess you have an LG fridge?

 

[DanH]

Best to just hit the ignore button like I have. Eventually he will go away like a bad smell.

Another free speech champion writes…

Been here 20 years. You lunatics haven’t completely taken over the asylum yet.

 

[cryrst]

Another free speech champion writes…

Been here 20 years. You lunatics haven’t completely taken over the asylum yet.

The concept of ignored has been missed me thinks 🤦

 

[Stirlingsays]

Please keep it safely locked away in a dark room until eternity. Such opinions ought never see the light of day. They are a disservice to human intelligence.

Mmmm....sounds like you have right wingers locked in your cellar.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Not sure why you bother. It’s like trying to rationalise with some mince in the fridge that’s become sentient.

Mince sentient racism.

Always knew it.

Normally you guys love a bit of mincing.

 

[Stirlingsays]

I guess you have an LG fridge?

Or he might be taking a sh1t ton of LSD.

In his defence he does like the Greens.....Maybe his celery has been talking back to him.