US Politics

[Wisbech Eagle]

Coming to conclusions about a non white without proper due diligence.

Some people have a name for that. 😀

More likely to be reaching conclusions about an obvious misogynist. The skin colour being irrelevant.

 

[cryrst]

Like many online right commentators, him and Tate just scream closet gays.

So being gay is wrong ?

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Where's your evidence that I watch Tate? I have watched a bit but not for ages. And Watson says nothing, he just puts together videos that already exist. Talk about shooting the messenger.

You apply a whole lot of inference. What a tantrum, it's really why the term libtard was invented.

If any messenger only selects messages taken from those you regard with suspicion, or worse as slimeballs, he deserves to be shot. Metaphorically speaking of course.

 

[cryrst]

I don’t know your mind but if you really came to such a conclusion without any preconceptions then you must need to get your eyes tested. What you think you saw simply doesn’t exist.

I hope either the State or the family bring a prosecution so a jury can decide culpability. I also hope that the family’s silence isn’t bought by the administration, or one of their billionaire backers, offering compensation. I want to see that ordered, not offered.

The best defence I can see is for the officer to blame a lack of training for an ill considered response, thus shifting the blame to where it really belongs. He might avoid jail that way, if accompanied by sufficient remorse.

And you would accept a jury decision unequivocally ?

 

[ASCPFC]

So being gay is wrong ?

I thought it was cool but it's not cool enough now. You have to be a few things now.

 

[DanH]

So being gay is wrong ?

Yes because of course that’s what I said isn’t it.

 

[ASCPFC]

More likely to be reaching conclusions about an obvious misogynist. The skin colour being irrelevant.

He could be Roma, not sure really.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

PJW rocks!

He even banged a tranny once.

No pleasing the left.

Anyone who expresses admiration for someone who has worked for Alex Jones and has spread the kind of wild conspiracy theories that Paul Joseph Watson does, immediately taints their own reputation.

The man is simply monetising hatred.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

And you would accept a jury decision unequivocally ?

A free and fair jury selected properly, having been shown all the facts, and not subjected to pressure or influence, yes of course.

 

[cryrst]

Yes because of course that’s what I said isn’t it.

Ok
So is being gay wrong !
Changed it to a question not a statement.
And why actually did you include that in your post ?

 

[cryrst]

A free and fair jury selected properly, having been shown all the facts, and not subjected to pressure or influence, yes of course.

Nah because you would assume politics got involved if it wasn’t a guilty verdict.

 

[Spindle]

Yes, because of course that is bigotry.

You did. You used being gay as a negative concept. If you weren't homophobic then why would you think calling someone gay would be insulting?

 

[Spindle]

I’ve watched some. Don’t want, or need, to watch any more. They were more than enough.

I don't believe you.

Post a link

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Nah because you would assume politics got involved if it wasn’t a guilty verdict.

What bit of my answer did you fail to understand?

Or are you another who thinks you know my mind better than I do?

 

[Spindle]

Like Paul Joseph Watson, his target audience is disaffected men who want to blame anyone but themselves for their own failures and miserable lives.

Shows that you've not ever watch him either because that's absolutely not what his videos are about, remotely.

 

[Spindle]

If any messenger only selects messages taken from those you regard with suspicion, or worse as slimeballs, he deserves to be shot. Metaphorically speaking of course.

More prejudice.

Or are you telling us that videos from cop body cams and the phones of girls who are being sexually harassed and attacked are suspicious slime balls.

And you've chucked in your approval of Kirk's shooting by default.

I thought that Minnesota lesbian who got shot was a suspicious slimeball so she deserved it then. According to your logic.

 

[Spindle]

I thought it was cool but it's not cool enough now. You have to be a few things now.

You have to identify as gay but not actually being gay, I think.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I don't believe you.

Post a link

It’s far too long ago for me to recall which ones I saw, or indeed what the detail was. I wasn’t looking but when they popped up I decided to take a look to see what the fuss was about. A few minutes was enough. Not for me!

 

[Spindle]

Yes because of course that’s what I said isn’t it.

Yes. Yes you did.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Like many online right commentators, him and Tate just scream closet gays.

Doesn't that mean you lot should like them?

Gay stuff is your religion.

I mean you certainly proved how eager you are to get on your knees.