Wisbech Eagle
Member
- Location
- Truro Cornwall
- Country
England
You wouldn’t. It would be ruled inadmissible as it would be both irrelevant and clearly false.in my defence, i would show the Court a video clip of a speech of a fella saying i don't need to pay my tv license. A speech With all the words spliced together from thousand hours of his previous speeches. A speech by Donald Trump.
There’s a huge difference between using clips from a speech to make a particular point in the context of a documentary, which was never claimed to be anything else, and presenting facts in a Court.