He didn’t mock the tragedy at all. He sent his condolences and regrets that something like this can happen in the USA. Any mocking is directed at the response of the right. Nothing else.
What “censorship games” do you imagine have been the responsibility of the left? For your imagination is the only place they exist.
Charlie Kirk held, and spread ideas that are typical of the evangelical right. He advocated for Christian Nationalism, was anti abortion, anti DEI, anti LGBT rights. It’s perfectly ok to hold such ideas but it’s not to advocate for their adoption if the majority opposes them. It’s no surprise when such extreme views produce equality extreme reactions. Such views are divisive, as you either love them, or hate them. I advocate that those who believe in them should be fully entitled to live their own lives by such standards, but should not be allowed to impose their beliefs on others.
I oppose violence of any kind, whoever is involved, or whatever the source. So you will never, ever read or hear anything from me defending riots. That’s completely different to trying to identify the underlying causes of events, which is what I often attempt to do.
You, once again, lay your prejudice out in the open by your use of “abortion murder clinics”. An offensive and grossly inappropriate term. I have absolutely no problem with any woman who refuses to have an abortion, in any circumstances, on moral or religious grounds. That is entirely her personal choice and will always be defended. However, the reverse applies. If a woman decides to have a legal abortion then no one should interfere in any way. You can campaign to change the law but unless and until it is changed you abide by it.