eaglesdare
Member
- Country
England
Because there’s a million plus drunk people about?
Like my nearly 3 year old has had a lobotomy, you.
So why not the same at Glastonbury?
England
Because there’s a million plus drunk people about?
Like my nearly 3 year old has had a lobotomy, you.
England
£396 million net benefit to the economy.
England
Sh*t yourself and run back to the tube?
England
Sh*t yourself and run back to the tube?
So why not the same at Glastonbury?
Pretty much. I wasn't hanging around to get stabbed.
Dude, you were scared of an arm wrestle of someone twenty years older than you and thought I was out to beat you up.
England
I was too busy laughing that a grown man was offering someone 20 years younger than him out for an arm wrestle on the internet.
England
There aren’t any houses at Glastonbury.
I feel sorry for your old school teachers. Must have been a lot of retirements after you moved on.
England
Sh*t yourself and run back to the tube?
England
Will never stop being funny how all of you are just massive, massive fannies when it comes down to it.
USA
considering that you are near an armed nutter, at all times.Will never stop being funny how all of you are just massive, massive fannies when it comes down to it.
England
I could if you paid me to.
How lazy are you Dan? Do you own work, you have Pew 2020 to go on. It's such an obvious thing you could stick in AI to see it's information background. Yet you ask me to do your work?
Why should I spend time on something so obvious when you're the one who apparently needs proof?
USA
England
Genuinely interested to know where it came from.
England
Oh good. Grok again.
Making inadequate brains feel smart.
England
Do you know what 636 divided by 1 million is?
England
£396 million net benefit to the economy.
I find that hard to believe.£396 million net benefit to the economy.
Scotland
The claimed figures seem unlikely anyway. It's estimated 1,000,000 visited on both Sunday and Monday (most of them the same people on each day) even if every man woman and child had spent £100 per day that would only be about half the total income quoted.I find that hard to believe.
It says that 160,000 tourists have a big impact. But can they prove those tourists only came for the carnival and if there was no carnival they would not come?
It sounds to me that they are bolting onto the carnival numbers that may or may not be specific to the carnival. From ChatGPT
"But that's not a rigorous net-benefit calculation,...while the £396m estimate itself already incorporates particular assumptions about direct, indirect and induced spending."
In other words would people spend that money anyway with or without a carnival?
Of course this logic applies to many other attractions where it is claimed they bring in an economic benefit.