They have handled the whole thing like the worst chess players in history.
All their mistakes are just placed onto the backs of the taxpayer.....they will be voted out and swan off to their rich lives and gold plated pensions......but the taxpayer is left holding the bag on tens of billions to Ukraine (which I don't see for the life of me us getting back)
Or are they actually competent chess players? Just not playing the same game that we were all led to believe?
Their actions make perfect sense if we accept some very harsh truths:
1) They don't care about the loss of life (Ukrainian, Russian or European), they even welcome it, particularly of young white males of fighting age. This group is their real enemy and likely future source of opposition to their plans
2) War is preferable to peace, the more prolonged the better.
3) Endless stalemate is actually the preferred status of the war, because it provides a stable laboratory
4) This 'stable laboratory' allows them to test their expensive new AI weapons, and offload their old weapons for £.
4) Both 2, 3 and 4 ensure a continued transfer of wealth from ordinary taxpayers to the elites via the military/industrial complex.
5) The transition to an AI/digital war machine actually requires all of the above to take place.
6) The AI/digital 'army' of the future will allow them to exercise total control, without the risk of human elements turning on them.
7) Just as in WW1 the leaders of the opposing sides have a much cosier relationship than ordinary people realise. In WW1 this was direct family links through royal bloodlines. In the 21st century, this is through the WEF, particularly the 'Young Global Leaders' programme of which Putin and many Western leaders jointly attended.