We all have those.
Also, define which weapons they have that are aggressive and not "passive defensive" (whatever the feck that means in the context of ordnance) ?
I am also not impressed with this constant reference to the state sponsorship of terrorism point hauled out to justify any action against Iran. When pressed for evidence of this, after some umming and arring, people are left only with proxy wars in the region (no way has the West ever engaged in them), and radical Islamic organizations whose sole ambit is the destruction of Israel.
On the latter, a valid point; but not our war. Israel is big enough and ugly enough to look after its own problems. Did we enlist their help (or anyone's) in Northern Ireland?
When pressed for terrorism by Iran directly against British (or other Western) interests..? The last time I raised the point, someone actually referenced the kidnap of US embassy staff in 1979!!!