US Politics

WSJ has published a birthday card from Trump to Epstein which hints at secrets.

Trump has flatly denied it was him.

I haven't read the article but as anyone can write a card I assume that they have some evidence that it comes from Trump and is not made up. If they don't then that is irresponsible journalism.
 
WSJ has published a birthday card from Trump to Epstein which hints at secrets.

Trump has flatly denied it was him.

I haven't read the article but as anyone can write a card I assume that they have some evidence that it comes from Trump and is not made up. If they don't then that is irresponsible journalism.

Well Trump is suing them so they better have strong or conclusive evidence.

I very much suspect they don't.
 
WSJ has published a birthday card from Trump to Epstein which hints at secrets.

Trump has flatly denied it was him.

I haven't read the article but as anyone can write a card I assume that they have some evidence that it comes from Trump and is not made up. If they don't then that is irresponsible journalism.
If it was true it would have been publish during the elections.
 
To anyone actually interested in the Epstein case....outside of just attacking Trump....but genuinely interested in justice being done.

Be aware that you will get a lot of deliberate misleading commentary about releasing files from the Justice department or FBI or courts.

None of these departments or institutions hold the incriminating evidence...or at least most if not all of it that involves people sexually abusing outside of Epstein himself.

That stuff was taken by or transferred to CIA/Mossad (because it's both of them) back when he was initially raided.

Most, if not all of it would have been destroyed.
 
So the summary is, no " client list " for Epstein has ever materialised.

If a list of names ever emerges, it will be nothing more than a list of names.

People will draw conclusions but that is quite different to evidence of criminal activity.

I would support any legitimate prosecution of anyone who engages in under age sex.

What we can't have is a load of insinuations based on desired outcomes which is exactly what is happening on this forum.

People who can do no more than use phrases such as " everyone knows ", " it's obvious that " etc should really just STFU and try to post something with at least some basis in fact.

Becky has kindly reconfirmed that spouting bollocks is ok so I have little hope of the cohort of bollocks spouters to in any way desist

Are you worried you’re on there too, Owen?
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top