Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
Scotland
It does when those opinions are based on no more than wishful thinking and contradict and oppose many years personal experience.
US Politics
- Topic starter Stirlingsays
- Start date
Wisbech Eagle
Member
- Location
- Truro Cornwall
- Country
England
Is your opinion, to which you are entitled, but you too are not omnipotent.
Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
-
Scotland
I'll believe that when any opinion which doesn't fit the preconceptions isn't dismissed out of hand.
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
I'm hearing that there is movement in the Trump administration over Epstein after the rejection to moving on by the base.
Wisbech Eagle
Member
- Location
- Truro Cornwall
- Country
-
England
That I argue is sufficient evidence that dismissal out of hand is not happening.
If all I responded was, “you are wrong”, then you would be right. As it isn’t, you aren’t.
Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
-
Scotland
Wisbech Eagle
Member
- Location
- Truro Cornwall
- Country
-
England
There is an apparent move to ask Bondi to publish “relevant” material. Thus allowing her to discriminate and control the narrative, which is only what she is already doing.
The suspicion that something is being covered up won’t be mitigated until some red meat is thrown to the wolves.
So I predict someone will become a sacrificial lamb, but that it won’t be Trump, and all of this is merely the preparatory dance.
Has anyone seen the Duke of York shopping in Sainsbury’s for incontinence pads?
Wisbech Eagle
Member
- Location
- Truro Cornwall
- Country
-
England
You are therefore guilty of that you accuse me of! Very Trump like!
out of hand
1. out of control: 2. If you refuse something out of hand, you refuse it…
dictionary.cambridge.org
Feel free to disagree. It’s your right. As it is mine!
Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
-
Scotland
There is still a difference between an opinion based on decades of personal experience and one based on wishful thinking and idealism.You are therefore guilty of that you accuse me of! Very Trump like!
out of hand
1. out of control: 2. If you refuse something out of hand, you refuse it…
Feel free to disagree. It’s your right. As it is mine!
eaglesdare
Member
- Country
-
England
So what's caused this latest TDS flair up I wonder 🤔
Probably the horse you’ve backed trying to cover up him being implicated in being a massive f***ing nonce and even his base are realising 🤣
So you are stating he is a child molester?
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
To lighten the mood.
Allegedly. Funny that this list now supposedly doesn’t exist and Ghislaine Maxwell is apparently in prison for sex trafficking under age girls to no one.
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
I don't get it when I hear people say that.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe for one second what is coming out of the DoJ.....However, how is it 'no one'? Jeffery Epstein was clearly raping them.
Good point. The two of them were definitely alone with those girls at all those parties though.
Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
-
England
I think we all know that Trump and his adminstration are protecting CIA/Mossad (joined at the hip) and those who were involved in this blackmail sex ring.
As did the Democrats before them.
From what I heard from Mike Benz. Epstein was running the sex stuff as more of a side hustle to his main job, which was as a finance middle man for CIA 'keep quiet' projects..
Tucker Carlson holds the goods, down to his links in the CIA....What he said about the real spicy evidence is/was being held by CIA/Mossad (probably destroyed now) and not by the DoJ or FBI.....But they know regardless.
At least the Republican base won't stand for it.....unlike the Democratic base who seemingly didn't give a hoot.
Last edited:
Now we have alledly which is not what you originally wrote.
So to be clear, in your opinion, everyone on whatever " list " you are referring to is a paedophile, allegedly
Last edited:
SavoyTruffle
Member
- Country
-
England
And himself…
DOJ cleaning house on Trump’s executive orders
Comey will know a lot about the wider case, even about evidence that will have been destroyed historically and more recently.
I think if there’s one thing that unites Dems and Reps in the states it’s this issue (the voters anyway). I hope that it makes both sides question if the ‘outsiders’ they are shown are really as far from the establishment as they are presented to us.
The significant difference is the previous guy didn’t campaign on releasing the evidence and so was just kind of able to skirt along without the issue being addressed. A lot of the revolt Trump is seeing is his own undoing. I just hope that at the end of all of this some justice is served (even if it will never be total).
So the summary is, no " client list " for Epstein has ever materialised.
If a list of names ever emerges, it will be nothing more than a list of names.
People will draw conclusions but that is quite different to evidence of criminal activity.
I would support any legitimate prosecution of anyone who engages in under age sex.
What we can't have is a load of insinuations based on desired outcomes which is exactly what is happening on this forum.
People who can do no more than use phrases such as " everyone knows ", " it's obvious that " etc should really just STFU and try to post something with at least some basis in fact.
Becky has kindly reconfirmed that spouting bollocks is ok so I have little hope of the cohort of bollocks spouters to in any way desist
If a list of names ever emerges, it will be nothing more than a list of names.
People will draw conclusions but that is quite different to evidence of criminal activity.
I would support any legitimate prosecution of anyone who engages in under age sex.
What we can't have is a load of insinuations based on desired outcomes which is exactly what is happening on this forum.
People who can do no more than use phrases such as " everyone knows ", " it's obvious that " etc should really just STFU and try to post something with at least some basis in fact.
Becky has kindly reconfirmed that spouting bollocks is ok so I have little hope of the cohort of bollocks spouters to in any way desist