US Politics

[Penge Eagle]

So the Democrat judges that ruled against are activists but the Republican ones aren’t?

Right.

You are a master at moving the goal posts!

 

[nead1]

Actually it isn’t. There are very clear echoes in the wind that those with their ears tuned can detect. Not identical but enough similarities to cause concerns.

Exactly; the areas that immediately spring to mind are 6th Jan and trying to overturn an election, ignoring the judiciary if he doesn't like their judgements, attacks on universities, ruling by decree and essentially ignoring Congress, expansionist tendencies re other countries territories, forced detentions, spreading fear and constant disinformation/lying. That's quite a long list already.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

So you were blind to the limitations of the previous President, but somehow see them in a man who acts and looks 20 years younger?

I have a question. Are you OK?

Have you actually seen how Trump looks recently? There’s more make up being applied than ever went on Coco.

 

[Penge Eagle]

Actually it isn’t. There are very clear echoes in the wind that those with their ears tuned can detect. Not identical but enough similarities to cause concerns.

Conspiracy theories.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Following the law? More like twisting it to fit his agenda! That activist judge is just another anti Trump hack trying to undermine democracy while pretending it’s justice.

Been in their Court recently then or know them personally?

Do you set yourself a daily task of ensuring that what you post has to be more nonsensical than yesterday?

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Conspiracy theories.

No. Observations that lead to concerns.

 

[Penge Eagle]

I do not believe they are because it’s the law that is their master. Not personal beliefs. That personalities vary is a fact of human nature and some will express themselves with compassion and kindness whilst others are forthright.

I once took a bank to court over some charges I thought were unjustified. The Judge found for the bank but scolded them for not being more considerate and was very kind in his words to me. Thus he followed the law whilst being compassionate.

I know it’s but one example but from my experience the same can be said for most.

I am neither naive or deluded.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1910382361935519942

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Isn't he following the law?

Not all the law! Only those pieces that suit the agenda. Things that get in the way are ignored.

 

[Penge Eagle]

No. Observations that lead to concerns.

Pop a couple of these and you will feel better.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1910382361935519942

Judges are allowed private opinions which, should they be experts in their field, deserve to be listened to. Reposting another expert’s opinion is to contribute to the debate.

None of that stops them doing their job and applying the law as it stands. There is a clear demarcation line between the personal and the professional.

If you take your attitude to its logical conclusion those who sit in judgement should only be those who agree with the politics of the incumbent government. When did that happen before?

 

[eaglesdare]

Been in their Court recently then or know them personally?

Do you set yourself a daily task of ensuring that what you post has to be more nonsensical than yesterday?

No need to be in their court to see the bias it's blatant for all to see. These activist judges push their anti-Trump agenda daily, ignoring the will of the people. You can keep on deflecting. 👍🏻

 

[Penge Eagle]

Judges are allowed private opinions which, should they be experts in their field, deserve to be listened to. Reposting another expert’s opinion is to contribute to the debate.

None of that stops them doing their job and applying the law as it stands. There is a clear demarcation line between the personal and the professional.

If you take your attitude to its logical conclusion those who sit in judgement should only be those who agree with the politics of the incumbent government. When did that happen before?

Erm... have you been following the news lately?

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Pop a couple of these and you will feel better.

View attachment 886

I feel fine. Thanks for the pseudo concern.

Could I recommend some ear drops to you so you can detect the echoes that I, and many, many others can. Being deaf to the obvious is not healthy.

What’s happening in the USA is of genuine concern but it’s for them to deal with. There are enough there, from both sides of politics, who share these concerns for there to be confidence that they will be overcome.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Erm... have you been following the news lately?

Yes, but I suspect you may be getting it presented by those with a particular agenda.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

No need to be in their court to see the bias it's blatant for all to see. These activist judges push their anti-Trump agenda daily, ignoring the will of the people. You can keep on deflecting. 👍🏻

Carry on.

Can I recommend you search for elevator suppliers. Your hole is too deep for ladders.

 

[steeleye20]

'We're in Chongqing, C-h-i-n-aaah'.

Brilliant chinese Trump impressionist.

'Look at these old people, they are walking, just chilling'.

😎

 

[eaglesdare]

Carry on.

Can I recommend you search for elevator suppliers. Your hole is too deep for ladders.

The only ones in a hole are you and your activist judge pals trying to bury democracy and the will of the people who voted in Trump. Elevators? Nah, we are climbing to victory 😉 Maga!

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

C- for comprehension. I didn’t of course say that ‘moderates’ had carried out terrorist attacks and raped children, I said that their policies have made such events common. Mind you, if the predominantly Muslin men that carry out the terrorist attacks and the predominately Muslim men involved in industrial scale child-rape gangs, do vote, I would wager that they vote Labour, or for the even more extreme Muslim factions that are appearing in elections these days – you know, those that you would call ‘moderates’. Green policies are extremist and doomed to failure.

I read what you wrote! You accused moderates of being indirectly responsible for grooming gangs and terrorism.

Now you suggest those that are responsible vote Labour, indirectly suggesting that moderates and Labour are the same thing.

Many traditional Tories are moderates. Green policies are not extreme.

So just more nonsense.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

The only ones in a hole are you and your activist judge pals trying to bury democracy and the will of the people who voted in Trump. Elevators? Nah, we are climbing to victory 😉 Maga!

Let me know when your shovel starts to glow.

 

[eaglesdare]

Let me know when your shovel starts to glow.

My shovel’s already glowing digging out the truth while you cheer for your activist judges! 👍🏻