• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

US Politics

That activist judge is just trying to make a name for himself.
Well you probably know the judge is abiding by the law. How outrageous is that?

Trump is evading laws and is well on the way to dictatorship. Just like Hitler. But hey he's for the people right? Yeah course he is. The USA is becoming like Russia, piss poor working people, billionaire oligarchs and a fast diminishing middle class.
 
Well you probably know the judge is abiding by the law. How outrageous is that?

Trump is evading laws and is well on the way to dictatorship. Just like Hitler. But hey he's for the people right? Yeah course he is. The USA is becoming like Russia, piss poor working people, billionaire oligarchs and a fast diminishing middle class.
And Canada and Greenland his Lebensraum.
 
Well you probably know the judge is abiding by the law. How outrageous is that?

Trump is evading laws and is well on the way to dictatorship. Just like Hitler. But hey he's for the people right? Yeah course he is. The USA is becoming like Russia, piss poor working people, billionaire oligarchs and a fast diminishing middle class.

Activist judges twist the law to fit their agenda. Trump’s fighting for the Americans, not some elite power grab. Comparing him to Hitler? That’s unhinged.

The real threat’s the establishment draining the middle class while crying about dictators. Trump’s building prosperity, not oligarchs.
 
Activist judges twist the law to fit their agenda. Trump’s fighting for the Americans, not some elite power grab. Comparing him to Hitler? That’s unhinged.

The real threat’s the establishment draining the middle class while crying about dictators. Trump’s building prosperity, not oligarchs.
Hahahahahaha! Prosperity! LMAO! For whom? It won't be the sad morons who voted for him.

Yep those judges have an agenda alright ..... err can you tell me what it is? To stop the virtuous works of Saint Donald? Or could it just be to uphold the law?
 
Hahahahahaha! Prosperity! LMAO! For whom? It won't be the sad morons who voted for him.

Yep those judges have an agenda alright ..... err can you tell me what it is? To stop the virtuous works of Saint Donald? Or could it just be to uphold the law?

Prosperity for the working class with record-low unemployment, tax cuts, and deregulated business so small business can thrive, not just corporate suits.

Those Judges with cherry picked rulings to block Trump’s policies, not enforce law neutrally. Trump is exposing the establishment’s rigged game.
 
Prosperity for the working class with record-low unemployment, tax cuts, and deregulated business so small business can thrive, not just corporate suits.

Those Judges with cherry picked rulings to block Trump’s policies, not enforce law neutrally. Trump is exposing the establishment’s rigged game.
Here we have an example of the deluded beliefs of Trump's supporters.

The tax cuts will only benefit the wealthy. The "Corporate Suits" love Trump - he'll make them richer.

Blame the Judges (many of whom Trump selected) for imposing the law where it should be imposed.

Trump has done absolutely zero to help those who support him. Biggest con in US history.
 
Here we have an example of the deluded beliefs of Trump's supporters.

The tax cuts will only benefit the wealthy. The "Corporate Suits" love Trump - he'll make them richer.

Blame the Judges (many of whom Trump selected) for imposing the law where it should be imposed.

Trump has done absolutely zero to help those who support him. Biggest con in US history.

So many falsehoods here...

How can the corporate suits love Trump after the markets nose dived?

One example of helping the poor, is he wants to have tips tax-free which will be a tax cut for people working in the service industry.

The judges are activists such as US District Judge James Boasberg who only claims a "probable cause" in this deportation flights case. He has a history of obstructing immigration enforcements, while his wife is also a Democratic donor.

He's done zero, has he? Immigration was the second most important issue for voters and border crossings are down 95%.
 
Here we have an example of the deluded beliefs of Trump's supporters.

The tax cuts will only benefit the wealthy. The "Corporate Suits" love Trump - he'll make them richer.

Blame the Judges (many of whom Trump selected) for imposing the law where it should be imposed.

Trump has done absolutely zero to help those who support him. Biggest con in US history.

Deluded? Check the numbers in pre-COVID, Black and Hispanic unemployment hit historic lows under Trump, wages rose for low-income workers, and his tax cuts doubled the standard deduction, helping millions of middle-class US families.

small businesses also benefited more from deregulation.

Judges he picked? Even they face pressure to toe the establishment line or get sidelined.

Trump will deliver again to regular people not just the elites.
 
Here we have an example of the deluded beliefs of Trump's supporters.

The tax cuts will only benefit the wealthy. The "Corporate Suits" love Trump - he'll make them richer.

Blame the Judges (many of whom Trump selected) for imposing the law where it should be imposed.

Trump has done absolutely zero to help those who support him. Biggest con in US history.

There’s no reasoning. They find their own ‘facts’.
 
I bow to your expertise in these areas - you are about as One Nation Tory as Vanessa Redgrave, albeit the Tories are now what can be considered as left wing. Current Conservative, Labour and Liberal parties are hardly distinguishable, that is largely why the Tories have lost support.
There is a very good reason why there is a broad consensus in British politics but it seems to escape you and those who think like you.

It’s because we are not a country of extremes, neither of the left nor right. We are a country of moderates who lean a little one way or the other.

Whether you recognise it or not what you regard as conservatism is regarded by most others as extremism. Just as Corbyn was seen as extreme on the left. He had his moment in the spotlight caused by particular circumstances but look how quickly the cold water doused that.
 
There is a very good reason why there is a broad consensus in British politics but it seems to escape you and those who think like you.

It’s because we are not a country of extremes, neither of the left nor right. We are a country of moderates who lean a little one way or the other.

Whether you recognise it or not what you regard as conservatism is regarded by most others as extremism. Just as Corbyn was seen as extreme on the left. He had his moment in the spotlight caused by particular circumstances but look how quickly the cold water doused that.
Perhaps we used to be, but the policies of the so-called moderates that you champion and pretend to be, have made terrorist attacks and mass rape of children commonplace while the ‘moderates’ make excuses for the perpetrators. Lunatic green energy policies, over-government and punishing rates of taxation destroy our economy, sexual deviants are given ‘rights’ and are allowed to influence our children. People objecting to the termination of nascent life are persecuted. White people are discriminated against when seeking work. Yet you call this ‘moderate’! It’s pretty clear who the extremists are and it’s not traditional Conservatives – of which you are clearly not one however much squid-ink you spurt in saying you are.
 
Last edited:
You're more than welcome to fact check my last post 😊

You’ve picked out one so called ‘activist’ judge (always a good look to be dismissive about judges) out of the other 8 that agreed with the ruling, which is your opinion, not a fact. You’ve focused on the second most important thing to the electorate (how’s the first one going by the way?) and used it to try and make a point.

You’ve then provided no back up to the one verifiable thing in your post.

But a great post to be smug about other than that.
 
You’ve picked out one so called ‘activist’ judge (always a good look to be dismissive about judges) out of the other 8 that agreed with the ruling, which is your opinion, not a fact. You’ve focused on the second most important thing to the electorate (how’s the first one going by the way?) and used it to try and make a point.

You’ve then provided no back up to the one verifiable thing in your post.

But a great post to be smug about other than that.

I'm simply pointing out my post is factually correct and you cannot deny it. If you think judges are not politically motivated then you are either naive or deluded.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top