US Politics

If they claim asylum, whilst their arrival is “irregular” they aren’t illegal whilst their application is processed. It’s a fact!

You can argue it ought not to be and that we need to revise our laws but right now it is.

Stealing is unlawful. Not irregular.
From GOV.UK:
Illegal entry or irregular arrival: definitions and legal basis
Entry with or without leave

Section 3(1)(a) of the Immigration Act 1971 states that, persons who are not British
citizens shall not enter the UK unless given leave in accordance with provisions in
the Immigration Act 1971 or made under that act.
Entry without leave is a breach of section 3(1)(a) and therefore constitutes illegal
entry as defined by section 33(1) of the Immigration Act 1971 (as amended by the
1996 Asylum and Immigration Act).
Under section 24 (B1) of the Immigration Act 1971, a person who a) requires leave
to enter the United Kingdom and, b) knowingly enters the UK without such leave,
commits an offence which is triable both ways.
A person who commits this offence, on summary conviction in England and Wales,
to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine, or both. On summary
conviction in Scotland, that person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
12 months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both. In Northern
Ireland, the maximum sentence on summary conviction is 6 months imprisonment, or
a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
For conviction on indictment, that person is liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 4 years or a fine, or both.

[Is irregular maintenance of gas appliances unlawful or just irregular by the way?]
 

Well this stinks.

Maxwell has been rewarded with a move from a tough jail to a softer one known as "Club Fed" , this is SOP for co-operating prisoners who have evidence that the prosecution want.

What evidence? According to the Mail her interview is one big "nothing to see here guys and I did nothing wrong". So why get the cushy move then?

Something rotten in the state of Denmark.
 

Well this stinks.

Maxwell has been rewarded with a move from a tough jail to a softer one known as "Club Fed" , this is SOP for co-operating prisoners who have evidence that the prosecution want.

What evidence? According to the Mail her interview is one big "nothing to see here guys and I did nothing wrong". So why get the cushy move then?

Something rotten in the state of Denmark.
Can you blame her? Anyone would do the same.
 
Looks like another trans shooting in America today. Apparently with a gun that says "kill Donald Trump" with sky calling it a "gunman"


I haven't read all of the BBC's output on this from what I did read didn't mention that this person was a transsexual.

Is this the BBC denying the truth to the public out of ideological convictions? Trying to shape public reactions.

Transsexual or gender shootings have been happening more often, whereas in the past I never even heard of one and I lay the blame on this now becoming a threat upon progressive ideology.
 
I haven't read all of the BBC's output on this from what I did read didn't mention that this person was a transsexual.

Is this the BBC denying the truth to the public out of ideological convictions? Trying to shape public reactions.

Transsexual or gender shootings have been happening more often, whereas in the past I never even heard of one and I lay the blame on this now becoming a threat upon progressive ideology.

The biggest form of misinformation is not reporting the facts or leaving out key details. The BBC are the kings at this.
 

Well this stinks.

Maxwell has been rewarded with a move from a tough jail to a softer one known as "Club Fed" , this is SOP for co-operating prisoners who have evidence that the prosecution want.

What evidence? According to the Mail her interview is one big "nothing to see here guys and I did nothing wrong". So why get the cushy move then?

Something rotten in the state of Denmark.
It looks so obvious that even Trump’s base must be holding their noses and is likely to result in the reverse impact to that intended.
 
I haven't read all of the BBC's output on this from what I did read didn't mention that this person was a transsexual.

Is this the BBC denying the truth to the public out of ideological convictions? Trying to shape public reactions.

Transsexual or gender shootings have been happening more often, whereas in the past I never even heard of one and I lay the blame on this now becoming a threat upon progressive ideology.
Why would whether someone was transgender matter to this report? I have no idea if the perpetrator is and don’t care. It’s very unlikely to be relevant and if it emerges it was then that’s the time to report it. We weren’t told whether he was short, tall, bald or bearded either.
 
Why would whether someone was transgender matter to this report? I have no idea if the perpetrator is and don’t care. It’s very unlikely to be relevant and if it emerges it was then that’s the time to report it. We weren’t told whether he was short, tall, bald or bearded either.
Because degenerate deviants are always likely to be a danger to the rest of society.
 
Why would whether someone was transgender matter to this report? I have no idea if the perpetrator is and don’t care. It’s very unlikely to be relevant and if it emerges it was then that’s the time to report it. We weren’t told whether he was short, tall, bald or bearded either.

Motivation.

Why does any detail matter? Why would it matter if they were male or female for example. If you are reporting on something (not shape narratives) you inform those reading of what happened, when, where and by whom. The BBC are fine with reporting pretty much every other aspect they know about.....but while they know he was transsexual they seem to have deliberately left it out.
 
Motivation.

Why does any detail matter? Why would it matter if they were male or female for example. If you are reporting on something (not shape narratives) you inform those reading of what happened, when, where and by whom. The BBC are fine with reporting pretty much every other aspect they know about.....but while they know he was transsexual they seem to have deliberately left it out.
If such a motivation is discovered then that is the time it should be reported.

Until then doing so just stokes prejudice.

The BBC would have been 100% correct not to include it, if indeed it’s true and they know.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top