US Politics

No one is celebrating her death on here.

Stupidity and virtue signalling are not criminal acts

Pointing out her contribution to her own demise is not unreasonable

You’ve been more disparaging of the BBC on this thread than you have of the ICE officer who murdered her.
 
You should google murder as you clearly don't understand the meaning of the word.

Pointless engagement

It was both illegal and premeditated so risible if you do not consider it murder.

Expected from an authoritarian sadist who has said he would happily watch corporal punishment before though.
 
It was both illegal and premeditated so risible if you do not consider it murder.

Expected from an authoritarian sadist who has said he would happily watch corporal punishment before though.
I use risible so you do too , haha

The legality or otherwise yet to be determined

As for premeditation , that you state that to be the case simply shows the stupidity of your narrative.

Please explain how you know this.

Are you part of a hive mind with the ICE officer?

And yes, I would happily bring back corporal punishment, I believe it would free up prison space and reduce re-offending. The ferrel youth we have allowed to develop would think twice.
 
I use risible so you do too , haha

The legality or otherwise yet to be determined

As for premeditation , that you state that to be the case simply shows the stupidity of your narrative.

Please explain how you know this.

Are you part of a hive mind with the ICE officer?

And yes, I would happily bring back corporal punishment, I believe it would free up prison space and reduce re-offending. The ferrel youth we have allowed to develop would think twice.

And it won’t be determined because the Trump administration apparently consider themselves above the law and any due process. Ironic for the party of ‘law and order’.

That Vance has already said that the office has ‘total immunity’ shows that even they know it’s murder. Why would he need immunity if no crime has been committed?
 
We have prohibitions against swearing and threats of violence and other stuff is subjective.

Are you suggesting the site should be more sensitive and censor more?

I'd have to have some examples of the 'name calling and language' you deem unacceptable.
This is really my point, I give an opinion nothing more and you ask for evidence when I'm expressing a view and not claiming it to be a fact, there used to be a rule on language and etiquette towards fellow posters
 
And it won’t be determined because the Trump administration apparently consider themselves above the law and any due process. Ironic for the party of ‘law and order’.

That Vance has already said that the office has ‘total immunity’ shows that even they know it’s murder. Why would he need immunity if no crime has been committed?
Another word salad, why then would Biden's family need immunity?

You don't understand what immunity means either.

Wibble away
 
This is really my point, I give an opinion nothing more and you ask for evidence when I'm expressing a view and not claiming it to be a fact, there used to be a rule on language and etiquette towards fellow posters
Perhaps if you had written " in my opinion...... ", your inference was that it is getting worse.

Your opinion is based on what though? A feeling, instinct ?
 
This is really my point, I give an opinion nothing more and you ask for evidence when I'm expressing a view and not claiming it to be a fact, there used to be a rule on language and etiquette towards fellow posters

Is there something wrong with asking for specifics?

Ok, I'll give you my opinion and it's that for the most part I don't think a problem exists in general no.

That's not to say that situations don't occur when discussions get heated but that's always been the case.

Maybe you feel differently and I'm not saying you're wrong or right, we all have different ideas.

Maybe what you're referring to is when things get too personal and sure, I think that happens occasionally and if you think something steps over a line (for example, I don't like people talking about people's families) then you can complain to the mods.

I like banter and a certain amount of trolling as long as there's a line that people respect and I have no problem with people arguing different visions....it's a politics forum after all.

Obviously I'm not a mod but I think the site gets it mostly right.
 
Is there something wrong with asking for specifics?

Ok, I'll give you my opinion and it's that for the most part I don't think a problem exists in general no.

That's not to say that situations don't occur when discussions get heated but that's always been the case.

Maybe you feel differently and I'm not saying you're wrong or right, we all have different ideas.

Maybe what you're referring to is when things get too personal and sure, I think that happens occasionally and if you think something steps over a line (for example, I don't like people talking about people's families) then you can complain to the mods.

I like banter and a certain amount of trolling as long as there's a line that people respect and I have no problem with people arguing different visions....it's a politics forum after all.

Obviously I'm not a mod but I think the site gets it mostly right.
Being called a Jew hater.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top